No. 18-995
Crunch San Diego, LLC v. Jordan Marks
Tags: automatic-telephone-dialing-system capacity-to-dial circuit-conflict civil-procedure due-process random-number-generator random-or-sequential-number-generator statutory-interpretation tcpa telemarketing-practices telephone-consumer-protection-act
Latest Conference:
N/A
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the Ninth Circuit erred in expanding the TCPA's definition of "automatic telephone dialing system"—in acknowledged conflict with the Third Circuit and in stark tension with the D.C. Circuit—to encompass any device with capacity merely to dial stored telephone numbers.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Ninth Circuit erred in expanding the TCPA's definition of 'automatic telephone dialing system'
Docket Entries
2019-02-26
Petition Dismissed - Rule 46.
2019-02-21
Agreement to Dismiss Case Pursuant to Rule 46.1 filed.
2019-02-15
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including April 1, 2019.
2019-02-13
Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 1, 2019 to April 1, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-01-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 1, 2019)
Attorneys
Crunch San Diego, LLC
Pratik Arvind Shah — Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, LLP, Petitioner
Jordan Marks
Seyed Abbas Kazerounian — Kazerouni Law Group APC, Respondent