| 25-567 |
Verizon Communications Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, et al. |
Second Circuit |
2025-11-12 |
Granted |
Amici (3) |
article-iii communications-act customer-data fcc-penalties judicial-review seventh-amendment |
Whether the Communications Act violates the Seventh Amendment and Article III by authorizing the FCC to order the payment of monetary penalties for fa… |
| 25-406 |
Federal Communications Commission, et al. v. AT&T, Inc. |
Fifth Circuit |
2025-10-06 |
Granted |
|
administrative-law article-three communications-act judicial-review monetary-forfeiture seventh-amendment |
Whether the Communications Act provisions governing FCC monetary forfeitures are consistent with the Seventh Amendment and Article III |
| 24-161 |
New York State Telecommunications Association, Inc., et al. v. Letitia James, Attorney General of New York |
Second Circuit |
2024-08-14 |
Denied |
Amici (5)Relisted (5) |
broadband-service common-carrier communications-act interstate-commerce preemption rate-regulation |
Whether the Communications Act preempts New York's broadband rate-regulation law |
| 21-719 |
Sandwich Isles Communications, Inc. v. United States |
Federal Circuit |
2021-11-16 |
Denied |
|
civil-rights communications-act confiscatory-rates due-process federal-circuit federal-communications-commission rate-regulation regulatory-taking takings |
Whether the lower court's holding that a regulatory taking claim based on confiscatory rates must be made at the Federal Communications Commission den… |
| 20-6667 |
Ronald Douglas v. Eric S. Schmitt, Attorney General of Missouri, et al. |
Eighth Circuit |
2020-12-21 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
administrative-procedure civil-rights communications-act constitutional-challenge due-process eminent-domain government-owned-stations human-rights-violations jurisdiction property-rights takings |
Whether the district court had exclusive jurisdiction over the in rem eminent domain action |
| 18-1386 |
Dan M. Lipschultz, In His Official Capacity as Commissioner of the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission, et al. v. Charter Advanced Services (MN), LLC, et al. |
Eighth Circuit |
2019-05-03 |
Denied |
Amici (1)Relisted (3) |
brand-x brand-x-test communications-act fcc-regulation federal-communications-commission information-services preemption state-regulation telecommunications-services voice-over-internet-protocol voip-classification |
Whether VoIP service is a telecommunications service or an information service under the appropriate functional test from Brand X |