No. 18-1386

Dan M. Lipschultz, In His Official Capacity as Commissioner of the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission, et al. v. Charter Advanced Services (MN), LLC, et al.

Lower Court: Eighth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-05-03
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Amici (1)Relisted (3) Experienced Counsel
Tags: brand-x brand-x-test communications-act fcc-regulation federal-communications-commission information-services preemption state-regulation telecommunications-services voice-over-internet-protocol voip-classification
Key Terms:
JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2019-10-18 (distributed 3 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether VoIP service is a telecommunications service or an information service under the appropriate functional test from Brand X

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED The Communications Act distinguishes between “telecommunications services” and “information services.” Telecommunications services are subject to common carrier regulation by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), while the FCC has a policy against regulation of information services. The FCC has repeatedly declined to classify Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) service as either a telecommunications or an information service. Although VoIP service is a relatively new technology, it already has over 60 million subscribers in this country and is rapidly replacing traditional telephone service. In this case, the Eighth Circuit became the first circuit court to reach the VoIP classification issue. Over a strong dissent, the panel majority classified VoIP service as an information service. The majority concluded that the FCC’s policy against regulating information services conflicts with and preempts state regulation of VoIP service, despite the fact that the FCC has never applied this policy to VoIP. The questions presented are: 1. Whether, in the absence of an FCC decision classifying VoIP service as an information service, FCC policy can conflict with and preempt state regulation of VoIP service. 2. Whether VoIP service is a telecommunications service or an information service, under the appropriate functional test for classification determinations from Brand X.

Docket Entries

2019-10-21
Petition DENIED. Justice Thomas, with whom Justice Gorsuch joins, concurring in the denial of certiorari. The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition. (Detached <a href = 'https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/19pdf/18-1386_2034.pdf'>Opinion</a>)
2019-10-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/18/2019.
2019-10-09
Rescheduled.
2019-10-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/11/2019.
2019-10-07
Supplemental brief of respondents Charter Advanced Services (MN) LLC, et al. filed. (Distributed)
2019-10-03
Letter of October 3, 2019 from counsel for petitioners filed. (Distributed)
2019-09-25
Rescheduled.
2019-07-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-07-12
Reply of petitioners Dan M. Lipschultz, et al. filed.
2019-07-03
Brief of respondents Charter Advanced Services (MN) LLC, et al. in opposition filed.
2019-06-03
Brief amicus curiae of National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners filed.
2019-05-23
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including July 3, 2019.
2019-05-22
Motion to extend the time to file a response from June 3, 2019 to July 3, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-05-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 3, 2019)
2019-03-01
Application (18A889) granted by Justice Gorsuch extending the time to file until May 3, 2019.
2019-02-22
Application (18A889) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from March 4, 2019 to May 3, 2019, submitted to Justice Gorsuch.

Attorneys

Charter Advanced Services (MN) LLC, et al.
Ian Heath GershengornJenner & Block, Respondent
Ian Heath GershengornJenner & Block, Respondent
Dan M. Lipschultz, et al.
Elizabeth Catherine KramerOffice of the Minnesota Attorney General, Petitioner
Elizabeth Catherine KramerOffice of the Minnesota Attorney General, Petitioner
National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners
James Bradford Ramsay — Amicus
James Bradford Ramsay — Amicus