| 25-95 |
Michael Pung, Personal Representative of the Estate of Timothy Scott Pung v. Isabella County, Michigan |
Sixth Circuit |
2025-07-24 |
Granted |
Amici (26) |
excessive-fine fair-market-value fifth-amendment government-seizure property-rights takings-clause |
Whether taking and selling a home to satisfy a debt to the government, and keeping the surplus value as a windfall, violates the Takings Clause of the… |
| 23-1337 |
Baldwin County, Alabama, et al. v. Mike Bordelon, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
2024-06-25 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
due-process economic-use fair-market-value fifth-amendment just-compensation penn-central property-rights regulatory-taking takings temporary-prohibition temporary-taking |
Does the temporary prohibition of a specific project or use constitute a compensable regulatory taking, regardless of the availability of other econom… |
| 21-1521 |
New York State Teamsters Conference Pension and Retirement Fund v. C&S Wholesale Grocers, Inc. |
Second Circuit |
2022-06-03 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
arm's-length-transaction circuit-split erisa erisa-compliance fair-market-value multiemployer-pension multiemployer-pension-plan statutory-interpretation successor-liability withdrawal-liability |
Whether the Second Circuit erred in holding that 29 U.S.C. § 1392(c) requires fraudulent conduct |
| 19-8428 |
Marc Wyatt v. Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division |
Fifth Circuit |
2020-05-08 |
Denied |
IFP |
appointment-of-counsel constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process fair-market-value fifth-circuit legal-counsel replacement-cost right-to-self-representation self-representation |
Was the appointment of counsel valid? |
| 18-1062 |
Love Terminal Partners, L.P., et al. v. United States |
Federal Circuit |
2019-02-13 |
Denied |
Amici (8) |
civil-rights due-process economic-impact fair-market-value federal-law investment-backed-expectations investment-expectations just-compensation property-rights property-taking regulatory-environment regulatory-taking takings |
Whether courts may treat real property as worthless solely because the owner was not generating positive cash flow at the time of the taking |