| 24A418 |
The Gym 24/7 Fitness, LLC, On Behalf of Itself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Michigan |
Michigan |
2024-10-30 |
Presumed Complete |
|
fifth-amendment investment-expectations just-compensation penn-central-test property-rights regulatory-taking |
Whether a state regulation constitutes a regulatory taking under the Fifth Amendment when it substantially interferes with a private business's invest… |
| 23-1220 |
Building and Realty Institute of Westchester and Putnam Counties, Inc., et al. v. New York, et al. |
Second Circuit |
2024-05-17 |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (5) |
contract-clause due-process housing-stability investment-expectations market-value property-rights rent-control takings takings-clause tenant-protection |
Whether the changes made by the HSTPA effect physical takings, and as applied takings, and violate both the Due Process and Contract Clauses of the Co… |
| 19-223 |
Janice Smyth v. Conservation Commission of Falmouth, et al. |
Massachusetts |
2019-08-20 |
Denied |
Amici (4)Relisted (3) |
character-of-government-action character-of-governmental-action economic-impact investment-backed-expectations investment-expectations land-use-regulation penn-central penn-central-test property-rights property-value regulatory-taking regulatory-takings takings-clause-5th-amendment |
Whether the loss of all developmental use of property and a 91.5% decline in its value is a sufficient 'economic impact' to support a regulatory takin… |
| 18-1062 |
Love Terminal Partners, L.P., et al. v. United States |
Federal Circuit |
2019-02-13 |
Denied |
Amici (8) |
civil-rights due-process economic-impact fair-market-value federal-law investment-backed-expectations investment-expectations just-compensation property-rights property-taking regulatory-environment regulatory-taking takings |
Whether courts may treat real property as worthless solely because the owner was not generating positive cash flow at the time of the taking |
| 18-573 |
Colony Cove Properties, LLC v. City of Carson, California, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2018-11-01 |
Denied |
Amici (3) |
appellate-review character-of-regulatory-action city-of-monterey-v-del-monte-dunes economic-impact investment-backed-expectations investment-expectations jury-trial jury-trial-7th-amendment penn-central penn-central-test property-rights regulatory-takings seventh-amendment standard-of-review takings-clause-5th-amendment |
Whether a regulation that causes a property temporary but substantial cash losses is immune as a matter law from regulatory takings scrutiny if these … |