Was the appointment of counsel valid?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED QUESTION ONE: If THE RECORD IS VOID OF MARC TRACE WYATT BEING LEGALLY APPOINTED COUNSEL, DID THE FIFTH CIRCUIT ERR IN DETERMINING THAT HIS CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE ARTICLE 15.17 HEARING WAS THE APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL? QUESTION TWO: WAS THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO SELF_REPRESENTATION BY MARC TRACE WYATT VIOLATED BY THE DISTRICT COURT IN DENYING HIS REQUEST TO DO SO WITHOUT FIRST HOLDING A HEARING TO DETERMINE IF HE WAS ABLE TO DO SO? QUESTION THREE: WAS THE CONVICTION OF MARC TRACE WYATT OBTAINED ILLEGALLY BY ALLOWING THE DISTRICT COURT TO USE REPLACEMENT COST WHEN THE STATE ADMITS IT DID NOT ASCERTAIN THE FAIR MARKET VALUE OF THE DESTROYED PROPERTY? ii