Whether the Remedies, Procedures and Rights set forth in the Americans with Disabilities Act are unconstitutional

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether the Remedies, Procedures and Rights set forth in (a) the Americans with Disabilities Act (Title 42 c. 126 U.S.C. €€ 12101) generally and Enforcement (42 U.S.C. § 12133) and Regulations (42 U.S.C. 12134) and (b) Remedies. and Attorney Fees 29 : USS.C. § 794a and (c) Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000d et seq.) and (c) Department of Justice, Americans with Disabilities Act Title II Regulations (28 CER Part 35) and (d) Title 29 U.S.C. § 794 Section 504. Rehabilitation Act of 1973 are UNCONSTITUTIONAL under the Strict Scrutiny, Substantive Due Process of the “Equal Protection" in the U.S. Constitution, Amendment XIV and “Regulatory Taking" in the U.S. Constitution, Amendment V concerning Qualified Individuals with Disabilities “Access to the Courts” for Administratively Disabled (Wheel Chair Barriers, Seeing, Hearing Disabled) versus Judicially Disabled (Bostwick’s Motion(s): Request for more Time: Stroke, Heart Surgery, Depression, Concentration). 2. Whether the Respondant(s) “(19) Massachusetts Appeals Court, (20) Middlesex ; Superior Court, Massachusetts Executive Office of the Trial Court” by claiming “Absolute Judicial Immunity” PRESENTS A CONFLICT OF LAWS and VIOLATES ‘ Bostwick’s Remedies, Procedures and Rights set forth in (a) the Americans with Disabilities Act (Title 42 c. 126 U.S.C. &€ 12101) generally and Enforcement (42 U.S.C. § 12133) and Regulations (42 U.S.C. 12134) and (b) Remedies and Attorney Fees 29 U.S.C. § 794a and (c) Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000d et seq.) and (c) Department of Justice, Americans with Disabilities Act Title Il Regulations (28 CFR Part 35) and (d) Title 29 U.S.C. § 794 Section 504. Rehabilitation Act of 1973 given Bostwick as a Qualified Individual with Disabilities and Bostwick’s Motion(s): Request for More Time given Stroke, Heart Surgery, Depression and lack of Concentration. 3. Whether the Supreme Judicial Court (SJC) Opinion(s) of “Absolute Judicial Immunity” concerning Bostwick’s Americans with Disabilities Act (Title 42 c. 126 U.S.C. &€ 12101) generally and Reasonable Accommodation Discrimination. (42 USS.C. § 12132) and Retaliation and Coercion (42 U.S.C. §§ 12202, 12203) specifically PRESENTS A CONFLICT OF LAWS and VIOLATES Bostwick’s Remedies, Procedures and Rights set forth in the Americans with Disabilities Act (Title 42 c. 126 USS.C. & 12101). 4. Whether MANIFEST INJUSTICE and THE PUBLIC INTEREST may require Removal of the WHOLE ORIGINAL Bostwick v. 44 Chestnut Street (1581CV05636) Case et al to Federal District Court, where abstention is inappropriate. Bostwick NOTICE OF BOSTWICK’S DISABILITIES (SEE