| 25-6429 |
Georgiy Chipunov v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
2025-12-23 |
Pending |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedIFP |
as-applied-challenge criminal-procedure facial-challenge first-amendment ninth-circuit true-threats |
In Counterman v. Colorado, 600 U.S. 66, 73 (2023), the Court clarified that, to comply with the First Amendment's protections, prosecutors "must prove… |
| 25A410 |
United States v. Aldo Ali Cordova Perez, Jr. |
Eighth Circuit |
2025-10-09 |
Presumed Complete |
|
922(g)(3) as-applied-challenge controlled-substance facial-challenge firearm-possession second-amendment |
Whether a federal statute criminalizing firearm possession by unlawful users of controlled substances is facially or as-applied unconstitutional under… |
| 25-5423 |
Davonta Dashune Turner v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
2025-08-21 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
constitutional-law criminal-law facial-challenge gun-rights second-amendment statutory-interpretation |
Whether 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) facially violates the Second Amendment |
| 25-5357 |
Jessie Dejuan Sullivan v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
2025-08-14 |
Denied |
IFP |
appellate-review criminal-law facial-challenge second-amendment sentencing-guidelines statutory-interpretation |
Whether 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) facially violates the Second Amendment and whether appellate courts should accept sentencing judges' assertions about hy… |
| 25-5193 |
Samuel San Miguel v. Greg Abbott, Governor of Texas, et al. |
Fifth Circuit |
2025-07-24 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-commitment due-process facial-challenge legislative-intent punitive-intent rule-59-motion |
Whether the District Court and Fifth Circuit improperly denied Petitioner's opportunity to provide 'clearest proof' that a Texas civil commitment act … |
| 25A36 |
Jacqusyn Zechariah Grubb v. United States |
Eighth Circuit |
2025-07-09 |
Presumed Complete |
|
922(g)(8) as-applied-challenge domestic-violence-restraining-order facial-challenge motion-to-dismiss second-amendment |
Whether 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(8) violates the Second Amendment as applied to individuals subject to domestic violence restraining orders, or whether such… |
| 25-5034 |
Shawn Thomas Borne v. United States |
Tenth Circuit |
2025-07-07 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
as-applied-challenge constitutional-challenge facial-challenge gun-rights second-amendment statutory-interpretation |
Whether 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) is unconstitutional under the Second Amendment, both facially and as applied to Mr. Borne, in light of New York State Ri… |
| 24-1276 |
California Association for the Preservation of Gamefowl v. Stanislaus County, California |
Ninth Circuit |
2025-06-16 |
Denied |
|
constitutional-challenge due-process facial-challenge property-rights regulatory-taking statute-of-limitations |
Whether a statute of limitations for facial constitutional challenges begins to run solely from the date of enactment, or whether each day of continue… |
| 24-7398 |
Dionte Dorun Matlock v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
2025-06-11 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
constitutional-challenge criminal-law facial-challenge gun-rights second-amendment statutory-interpretation |
Whether 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) facially violates the Second Amendment? |
| 24-433 |
Horseracing Integrity and Safety Authority, Incorporated, et al., v. National Horsemen's Benevolent and Protective Association, et al. |
Fifth Circuit |
2024-10-17 |
GVR |
Amici (1)Relisted (3) |
administrative-law circuit-split facial-challenge federal-enforcement horseracing-integrity separation-of-powers |
Whether the enforcement provisions of the Horseracing Integrity and Safety Act are facially unconstitutional under the doctrine of separation of power… |
| 24-5298 |
Jose Rosado v. United States |
Tenth Circuit |
2024-08-09 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
bruen-standard constitutional-challenge facial-challenge gun-rights second-amendment statutory-interpretation |
Whether 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) is unconstitutional under the Second Amendment in light of New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass'n, Inc. v. Bruen |
| 24-5126 |
Michael J. Brillon v. United States |
Second Circuit |
2024-07-23 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
as-applied-challenge As-Applied-Unconstitutionality Bruen bruen-decision constitutional-challenge conviction-review Due-Process facial-challenge Facial-Unconstitutionality Felons second-amendment |
Second-Amendment |
| 24-5089 |
Devonte Antonio Veasley v. United States |
Eighth Circuit |
2024-07-16 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
2nd-amendment constitutional-rights controlled-substances due-process facial-challenge firearms gun-rights second-amendment standing statutory-interpretation |
Is 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(3) facially unconstitutional? |
| 23A985 |
Jonathan Alexander Morales-Lopez v. United States |
Tenth Circuit |
2024-05-03 |
Presumed Complete |
|
constitutional-challenge criminal-law due-process facial-challenge statutory-interpretation vagueness-doctrine |
Whether 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(3) is unconstitutionally vague on its face and violates due process by creating uncertainty about prohibited conduct |
| 23-5111 |
Jacob Webster, et al. v. Superior Court of California, City and County of San Francisco, et al. |
California |
2023-07-14 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
constitutional-analysis criminal-prosecution facial-challenge firearm-regulation new-york-state-rifle-and-pistol-association-v-brue overbreadth overbreadth-doctrine second-amendment united-states-v-stevens |
Whether facial Second Amendment challenges require proving no set of circumstances where the statute is valid or only that a substantial number of app… |
| 23-5095 |
Marland Maynor v. United States |
Fourth Circuit |
2023-07-13 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
2nd-amendment constitutional-challenge criminal-law criminal-procedure due-process facial-challenge federal-statute plain-error second-amendment standing |
Whether 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) is facially unconstitutional under the Second Amendment |
| 22-1104 |
Shawn Talbot v. Louis Eric Johnson, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2023-05-11 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
civil-procedure court-jurisdiction due-process facial-challenge federal-court federal-rules jurisdiction jurisdictional-challenge material-allegations pleading-requirements standing |
Whether the United States District Court, District of Nevada lacked lawful jurisdiction in cause no: 2:09CR-0078, and 2:10-CR-00520 |
| 22-7241 |
Eric Matthew Ray v. Utah |
Utah |
2023-04-07 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
circuit-split civil-rights constitutional-rights criminal-statute due-process facial-challenge first-amendment free-speech statutory-interpretation vagueness vagueness-doctrine |
Whether Salerno's 'no set of circumstances' test, the Hoffman/Grayned 'more stringent vagueness test,' or some other test, should govern judicial revi… |
| 22-6112 |
Aakash A. Dalal v. New Jersey |
New Jersey |
2022-11-18 |
Denied |
Response RequestedRelisted (2)IFP |
as-applied-challenge civil-rights constitutional-validity due-process facial-challenge salerno-test standing void-for-vagueness |
Whether litigants may bring facial constitutional challenges to laws without first successfully raising as-applied challenges? |
| 22-317 |
Jay Nygard, et ux. v. City of Orono, Minnesota |
Eighth Circuit |
2022-10-05 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
circuit-split civil-rights constitutional-challenge criminal-enforcement due-process facial-challenge municipal-ordinance pre-enforcement pre-enforcement-challenge vagueness void-for-vagueness |
Can a homeowner prevail on a Papachristou-based pre-enforcement challenge to a municipal permitting law? |
| 22-309 |
City of Salinas, California v. New Harvest Christian Fellowship |
Ninth Circuit |
2022-09-30 |
Denied |
Amici (1)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
circuit-split civil-rights equal-terms equal-terms-provision facial-challenge land-use-regulation religious-land-use rluipa zoning zoning-ordinance |
What must a RLUIPA plaintiff show in a facial 'equal terms' challenge? |
| 22-5119 |
Christopher Paul Hasson v. United States |
Fourth Circuit |
2022-07-18 |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
constitutional-law criminal-defendant criminal-law criminal-procedure due-process facial-challenge statutory-interpretation vagueness void-for-vagueness |
Whether a criminal defendant must show a statute is vague as applied to his own conduct to prevail on a facial void-for-vagueness challenge |
| 21-7537 |
Leonardo Gutierrez v. Texas |
Texas |
2022-04-05 |
Denied |
IFP |
constitutional-challenge constitutional-law criminal-procedure due-process extraneous-evidence facial-challenge judicial-jurisdiction jury-trial penal-code ramos-v-louisiana |
Whether Texas Penal Code §21.02 is unconstitutional on its face |
| 21-6485 |
R. S. C. v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services |
Texas |
2021-12-01 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
as-applied-challenge constitutional-challenge due-process facial-challenge fourteenth-amendment procedural-rights section-262.201(0) statutory-interpretation texas-family-code |
Does Texas Family Code, Section 262.201(0) violate the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment |
| 21-658 |
Rodolfo Canales, Jr. v. Ken Paxton, Attorney General of Texas, et al. |
Texas |
2021-11-03 |
Denied |
Response RequestedRelisted (2) |
constitutional-standard criminal-law due-process facial-challenge felony-offense indefinite-financial-support statutory-interpretation texas-supreme-court vagueness vagueness-doctrine |
Whether a statute with no definitions, explicit standards, reasonably clear guidelines, or objective criteria that allows a court to order indefinite … |
| 19-8663 |
Tesa Keith v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
2020-06-10 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appeal criminal-statute facial-challenge federal-courts federal-law plea-agreement procedural-challenge waiver |
Whether facial challenges to a federal criminal statute may be waived by plea agreement? |
| 19-6100 |
Melvyn Perry Sprowson, Jr. v. Nevada |
Nevada |
2019-10-01 |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
ashcroft-v-free-speech-coalition child-pornography constitutional-limits facial-challenge first-amendment free-speech new-york-v-ferber obscenity obscenity-standards overbreadth sexual-abuse state-regulation |
Whether a state regulation of child pornography that fails to satisfy all four requirements set forth in Ferber and that criminalizes conduct that is … |
| 19-67 |
United States v. Evelyn Sineneng-Smith |
Ninth Circuit |
2019-07-12 |
Judgment Issued |
Amici (11) |
civil-rights commercial-activity constitutional-challenge criminal-law criminal-statute facial-challenge financial-gain first-amendment free-speech immigration immigration-law ninth-circuit statutory-interpretation |
Whether the federal criminal prohibition against encouraging or inducing illegal immigration for commercial advantage or private financial gain, in vi… |
| 18-9707 |
Blair Cook v. United States |
Seventh Circuit |
2019-06-18 |
GVR |
IFP |
2nd-amendment constitutional-rights due-process facial-challenge facial-vagueness fifth-amendment rehaif-v-united-states second-amendment standing statutory-interpretation threshold-question vagueness vagueness-doctrine |
Whether § 922(g)(3) is unconstitutionally vague under the Fifth Amendment's Due Process Clause |
| 18-1317 |
American Institute for International Steel, Inc., et al. v. United States, et al. |
Federal Circuit |
2019-04-17 |
Denied |
Amici (3) |
article-i checks-and-balances constitutional-challenge delegation-doctrine delegation-of-power facial-challenge federal-energy-administration-v-algonquin-sng legislative-power presidential-authority section-232 separation-of-powers steel-tariffs trade-expansion-act trade-expansion-act-1962 trade-expansion-act-of-1962 |
Whether section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 unconstitutionally delegates legislative power to the President, violating separation of powers |
| 18-1096 |
Charles G. Kinney v. Tani G. Cantil-Sakauye, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2019-02-22 |
Denied |
|
as-applied-challenge civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-challenge due-process facial-challenge first-amendment free-speech judicial-discretion pro-se-litigation retaliation standing vexatious-litigant |
Is California's vexatious litigant law unconstitutionally vague? |
| 18-7967 |
James Dalton Smith v. Texas |
Texas |
2019-02-14 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
constitutional-challenge criminal-defendant criminal-procedure direct-appeal due-process facial-challenge penal-statute standing statutory-interpretation |
Whether a criminal defendant may raise for the first time on direct appeal the constitutionality of the statute creating and defining the crime for wh… |
| 18-918 |
John Copeland, et al. v. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., et al. |
Second Circuit |
2019-01-16 |
Denied |
Amici (6)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
circuit-split civil-rights constitutional-law due-process facial-challenge free-speech johnson-v-united-states salerno-rule sessions-v-dimaya statutory-interpretation supreme-court-precedent vagueness vagueness-doctrine |
Whether a plaintiff need show that a law is vague in all of its applications to succeed in a facial vagueness challenge |
| 18-6739 |
David Earl Miller, et al. v. Tony Parker, Commissioner, Tennessee Department of Correction, et al. |
Tennessee |
2018-11-19 |
Denied |
IFP |
8th-amendment alternative-method available-alternative due-process facial-challenge fourteenth-amendment glossip-standard glossip-v-gross lethal-injection |
Whether under Glossip v. Gross, inmates raising a facial challenge to one of two methods contained in a State's lethal injection protocol must present… |
| 18-6282 |
Iseal Dixon v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
2018-10-10 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
2nd-amendment civil-rights commerce-clause congressional-authority constitutional-challenge constitutional-limits criminal-law due-process facial-challenge federal-firearms-law firearm-possession intrastate-possession second-amendment standing statutory-interpretation |
Whether 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) is facially unconstitutional because it exceeds Congress's authority under the Commerce Clause, and is unconstitutional … |
| 18-316 |
Brian Arthur Weese v. Maryland |
Fourth Circuit |
2018-09-11 |
Denied |
|
civil-procedure-jurisdiction civil-rights due-process facial-challenge federal-jurisdiction federal-rules jurisdictional-challenge material-allegations nonmoving-party personal-jurisdiction pleading-requirements sovereign-immunity standing subject-matter-jurisdiction sufficiency-of-pleadings |
Whether the court lacks subject matter and personal jurisdiction over the case |
| 18-5762 |
Pedro Garcia v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
2018-08-24 |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
commerce-clause congressional-authority constitutional-law constitutional-limits criminal-law due-process facial-challenge federal-criminal-law firearm-possession firearms intrastate-possession second-amendment standing statutory-interpretation |
Whether 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) is facially unconstitutional because it exceeds Congress's authority under the Commerce Clause, and is unconstitutional … |
| 18-115 |
Kimothy Maurice Wynn v. Washington |
Ninth Circuit |
2018-07-26 |
Denied |
|
civil-procedure due-process facial-challenge federal-courts federal-rules jurisdictional-challenge material-allegations personal-jurisdiction pleading-requirements pleadings sovereign-immunity standing subject-matter-jurisdiction |
Lack of subject matter and personal jurisdiction |
| 18-83 |
Stephen Busch, et al. v. Tamara Nappier, et al. |
Sixth Circuit |
2018-07-17 |
Denied |
|
circuit-split delegation-of-authority doubts-against-removal doubts-in-favor-of-federal-jurisdiction facial-challenge federal-jurisdiction federal-officer-removal removal-notice |
Whether a court resolves all doubts against removal and in favor of remand, or accepts the removal notice's allegations as true and resolves all doubt… |
| 18-43 |
Jesse Loor v. Jenny Bailey, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
2018-07-09 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
as-applied-challenge censorship civil-rights correctional-institutions due-process facial-challenge first-amendment mail-regulations prison-mail prison-regulations thornburgh-v-abbott |
Whether the facial validity of a mail regulation automatically defeats an as-applied challenge to a jail's censorship of particular publications? |