No. 25-5357
Jessie Dejuan Sullivan v. United States
IFP
Tags: appellate-review criminal-law facial-challenge second-amendment sentencing-guidelines statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
SecondAmendment
SecondAmendment
Latest Conference:
2025-11-14
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) facially violates the Second Amendment and whether appellate courts should accept sentencing judges' assertions about hypothetical sentencing decisions
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
First, whether 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) facially violates the Second Amendment? Second, some sentencing judges assert that they would have selected the exact same sentence regardless of any error in applying the Sentencing Guidelines. Should an appellate court accept those assertions at face value? i
Docket Entries
2025-11-17
Petition DENIED.
2025-10-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/14/2025.
2025-10-28
Reply of Jessie Sullivan submitted.
2025-10-28
Reply of petitioner Jessie Dejuan Sullivan filed. (Distributed)
2025-10-15
Brief of United States in opposition submitted.
2025-10-15
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2025-09-12
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including October 15, 2025.
2025-09-11
Motion of United States for an extension of time submitted.
2025-09-11
Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 15, 2025 to October 15, 2025, submitted to The Clerk.
2025-08-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 15, 2025)
Attorneys
Jessie Sullivan
Loui Itoh Mokodean — Federal Public Defender's Office NDTX, Petitioner
Loui Itoh Mokodean — Federal Public Defender's Office NDTX, Petitioner
United States
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent