| 24A642 |
William White, Jr. v. Chadwick Dotson, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections |
Fourth Circuit |
2024-12-30 |
Presumed Complete |
|
certificate-of-appealability habeas-corpus prison-mail pro-se supreme-court-rule time-extension |
Whether a pro se prisoner's delayed receipt of a Court of Appeals order due to prison mail procedures constitutes good cause for an extension of time … |
| 23-6395 |
In Re Daniel Lee Beckley |
|
2023-12-28 |
Denied |
IFP |
all-writs-act appellate-procedure federal-appeals filing-deadline houston-v-lack incarcerated-person mandamus prison-mail prisoner-litigation pro-se-filing supreme-court-mandate timely-filing |
Whether a writ of mandamus should issue directing the court of appeals to abide by the Supreme Court's holding in Houston v. Lack and accept Petitione… |
| 20-5350 |
Jordan Duke Venable v. City of Phoenix, Arizona, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2020-08-13 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
access-to-courts administrative-remedies civil-rights due-process prison-mail qualified-immunity |
Whether the Court of Appeals erred in affirming the district court's dismissal of petitioner's claims that prison officials violated his constitutiona… |
| 19-6704 |
JB Foster McAfee v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
2019-11-21 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
circuit-court circuit-court-rejection civil-procedure-mail-box-rule due-process federal-rules-appellate-procedure federal-rules-of-appellate-procedure habeas-corpus houston-v-lack mail-box-rule obstruction-of-justice prison-mail prisoner-appeals prisoner-petition sentencing-guidelines timeliness timely-filing |
Whether a prisoner's petition for rehearing is timely filed under the mail box rule |
| 18-6037 |
Raul S. Zavala v. Hector Rios, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2018-09-19 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
bivens-claim civil-rights constitutional-law constitutional-provisions damages-claim due-process federal-courts mail-restrictions prison prison-mail prison-officials prison-regulations standing |
WHETHER PLAINTIFF IS ENTITLED TO NOTICE WHEN UNOPENED' MAIL HAS BEEN REJECTED AND RETURNED TO THE SENDER BECAUSE IT FAILED TO COMPLY WITH PRISON REGUL… |
| 18-43 |
Jesse Loor v. Jenny Bailey, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
2018-07-09 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
as-applied-challenge censorship civil-rights correctional-institutions due-process facial-challenge first-amendment mail-regulations prison-mail prison-regulations thornburgh-v-abbott |
Whether the facial validity of a mail regulation automatically defeats an as-applied challenge to a jail's censorship of particular publications? |