No. 24-5126
Michael J. Brillon v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: as-applied-challenge As-Applied-Unconstitutionality Bruen bruen-decision constitutional-challenge conviction-review Due-Process facial-challenge Facial-Unconstitutionality Felons second-amendment
Key Terms:
SecondAmendment JusticiabilityDoctri
SecondAmendment JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2024-09-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Second-Amendment
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED This Court should grant certiorari because this Court’s decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n, Inc. v. Bruen, 597 U.S. 1 (2022) rendered Mr. Brillon’s sole offense of conviction unconstitutional, facially and as-applied to him. il
Docket Entries
2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-08-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-07-31
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2024-07-31
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-07-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 22, 2024)
Attorneys
Michael Brillon
Michelle Barth — Law Office of Michelle Anderson Barth, Petitioner
Michelle Barth — Law Office of Michelle Anderson Barth, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent