No. 22-6112

Aakash A. Dalal v. New Jersey

Lower Court: New Jersey
Docketed: 2022-11-18
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response RequestedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: as-applied-challenge civil-rights constitutional-validity due-process facial-challenge salerno-test standing void-for-vagueness
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2023-04-14 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether litigants may bring facial constitutional challenges to laws without first successfully raising as-applied challenges?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1. Whether litigants may bring facial constitutional challenges to laws without ; : first successfully raising as-applied challenges? 2. Whether litigants may bring facial challenges under the arbitrary enforcement ; : aspect of the void-for-vagueness doctrine without first successfully raising as: applied challenges? 3. Whether the Salerno “no set of circumstances” and “invalid in all applications” tests or substantive tests of constitutional validity govern facial constitutional challenges to laws after Johnson and Dimaya? : 4. Whether the New Jersey September 11", 2001 Anti-Terrorism Act is void-forse vagueness under the Due Process Clauses of the Fifth and Fourteenth -Amendments to the United States Constitution? . i

Docket Entries

2023-04-17
Petition DENIED.
2023-03-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/14/2023.
2023-03-13
Reply of petitioner Aakash Dalal filed. (Distributed)
2023-03-06
Brief of respondent New Jersey in opposition filed.
2023-01-24
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including March 6, 2023.
2023-01-20
Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 3, 2023 to March 6, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-01-04
Response Requested. (Due February 3, 2023)
2022-12-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/13/2023.
2022-11-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 19, 2022)

Attorneys

Aakash Dalal
Aakash Dalal — Petitioner
Aakash Dalal — Petitioner
New Jersey
Jeremy Michael FeigenbaumOffice of the New Jersey Attorney General, Respondent
Jeremy Michael FeigenbaumOffice of the New Jersey Attorney General, Respondent
Mark MusellaOffice of County Prosecutor, Respondent
Mark MusellaOffice of County Prosecutor, Respondent