Whether 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) is facially unconstitutional under the Second Amendment

QUESTIONS PRESENTED L Whether 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) is facially unconstitutional under the Second Amendment. First subsidiary question: Whether the plain-error standard applies to a facial constitutional challenge to a federal penal statute. Second subsidiary question: Whether, at a minimum, this Court should hold this petition pending this Court’s decision in United States v. Rahimi, No. 22-915 (cert. granted June 30, 2023), which will decide whether 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(8) is facially unconstitutional. Il. Whether the Fourth Circuit fundamentally “departed from the accepted and usual course of judicial proceedings,” Sup. Ct. R. 10(a), by denying petitioner leave to file a supplemental brief raising a new, meritorious issue based on intervening Fourth Circuit precedent decided after the court had granted rehearing in petitioner’s case on a different issue. i