No. 21-7537
IFP
Tags: constitutional-challenge constitutional-law criminal-procedure due-process extraneous-evidence facial-challenge judicial-jurisdiction jury-trial penal-code ramos-v-louisiana
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Immigration
Latest Conference:
2022-06-02
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Texas Penal Code §21.02 is unconstitutional on its face
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ISSUE ONE: : Whether, in light of Ramos v. Louisiana, Texas Penal Code §21.02 is unconstitutional on its face? ISSUE TWO: Whether a-‘trial court has jurisdiction to render a Penal Code unconstitutional on its face; and thus a Defendant should not be required to raise a frivilous objection in order to preserve a facial constitutional challenge on direct appeal? . , ISSUE THREE: Whether the trial court is required to conduct a hearing out of the presence of the jury to determine the admissibility of extraneous offense evidence, or is a brief statement on the record regarding the anticipated testimony sufficient? i
Docket Entries
2022-06-06
Petition DENIED.
2022-05-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/2/2022.
2022-01-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 5, 2022)