No. 25-5034
Shawn Thomas Borne v. United States
Tags: as-applied-challenge constitutional-challenge facial-challenge gun-rights second-amendment statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
SecondAmendment
SecondAmendment
Latest Conference:
2025-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) is unconstitutional under the Second Amendment, both facially and as applied to Mr. Borne, in light of New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. Bruen and United States v. Rahimi
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
Whether 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) is unconstitutional under the Second Amendment, both facially and as applied to Mr. Borne, in light of New York State Rifle & Pistol Association , Inc. v. Bruen , 597 U.S. 1 (2022) , and United States v. Rahimi , 602 U.S. 680 ( 2024).
Docket Entries
2025-10-06
Petition DENIED.
2025-07-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2025.
2025-07-11
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2025-07-11
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2025-07-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 6, 2025)
2025-05-28
Application (24A1156) granted by Justice Gorsuch extending the time to file until July 2, 2025.
2025-05-23
Application (24A1156) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from June 2, 2025 to July 2, 2025, submitted to Justice Gorsuch.
Attorneys
Shawn Borne
Leah D. Yaffe — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent
Moez Mansoor Kaba — Hueston Hennigan LLP, Respondent