No. 22-5119
Christopher Paul Hasson v. United States
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: constitutional-law criminal-defendant criminal-law criminal-procedure due-process facial-challenge statutory-interpretation vagueness void-for-vagueness
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess FirstAmendment JusticiabilityDoctri
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess FirstAmendment JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2022-10-07
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a criminal defendant must show a statute is vague as applied to his own conduct to prevail on a facial void-for-vagueness challenge
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether, to prevail on a facial void-for-vagueness challenge, a criminal defendant must show that the statute under which he is prosecuted is vague as applied to his own conduct.
Docket Entries
2022-10-11
Petition DENIED.
2022-09-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/7/2022.
2022-09-22
Reply of petitioner Christopher Hasson filed. (Distributed)
2022-09-08
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2022-08-09
Response Requested. (Due September 8, 2022)
2022-07-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-07-26
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-07-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 17, 2022)
2022-06-09
Application (21A802) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until August 19, 2022.
2022-06-06
Application (21A802) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from June 20, 2022 to August 19, 2022, submitted to The Chief Justice.
Attorneys
Christopher Hasson
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent