No. 24-5298
Tags: bruen-standard constitutional-challenge facial-challenge gun-rights second-amendment statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities
SocialSecurity Securities
Latest Conference:
2024-09-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) is unconstitutional under the Second Amendment in light of New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass'n, Inc. v. Bruen
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) is unconstitutional under the Second Amendment, both facially and as applied to Mr. Rosado, in light of New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n, Ine. v. Bruen, 597 U.S. 1 (2022)? i
Docket Entries
2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-08-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-08-14
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2024-08-14
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-08-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 9, 2024)
Attorneys
Jose Rosado
Leah D. Yaffe — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
Leah D. Yaffe — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent