No. 24-5089
Devonte Antonio Veasley v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 2nd-amendment constitutional-rights controlled-substances due-process facial-challenge firearms gun-rights second-amendment standing statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
SecondAmendment DueProcess
SecondAmendment DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2024-09-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Is 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(3) facially unconstitutional?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Is 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(3), which restricts the Second Amendment rights of all users of controlled substances, facially unconstitutional? i
Docket Entries
2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-08-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-07-30
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2024-07-30
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-07-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 15, 2024)
Attorneys
Devonte Veasley
Alexander David Smith — Parrish Law Firm, Petitioner
Alexander David Smith — Parrish Law Firm, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent