No. 23-1260

Douglas Bruce v. Ogden City Corporation, et al.

Lower Court: Tenth Circuit
Docketed: 2024-06-03
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: 14th-amendment civil-procedure civil-rights due-process municipal-action property-rights section-1983 standing statute-of-limitations takings takings-claim
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity DueProcess Takings FifthAmendment FourthAmendment JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2024-09-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the statute of limitations for a Section 1983 takings claim for the unconstitutional deprivation of private property can begin to run before the municipal action that caused the property owner to sacrifice all economically beneficial uses has transpired?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED Whether the statute of limitations for a Section 1983 takings claim for the _ unconstitutional deprivation of private property (specifically real estate) can begin to run before the municipal action that caused the property owner to sacrifice all economically beneficial uses has transpired? And further, whether the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals used the proper unit of property to measure if Mr. Bruce was forced to sacrifice all economically beneficial uses of his property? And finally, whether the 14th Amendment’s due process provisions permit the mayor of a city with a political or policy interest in the demolition of a building to act as the judge who determines whether a city will order the demolition of that building? 2

Docket Entries

2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-06-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-06-04
Waiver of right of respondent Ogden City Corporation, et al. to respond filed.
2024-04-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 3, 2024)

Attorneys

Douglas Bruce
Aaron Christopher GarrettNonprofit Legal Services of Utah, Petitioner
Aaron Christopher GarrettNonprofit Legal Services of Utah, Petitioner
Ogden City Corporation, et al.
Stephen Floyd NoelSmith Knowles, PLLC, Respondent
Stephen Floyd NoelSmith Knowles, PLLC, Respondent