No. 24-134

Lemon Bay Cove, LLC v. United States

Lower Court: Federal Circuit
Docketed: 2024-08-06
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived Experienced Counsel
Tags: army-corps-of-engineers economic-viability finality just-compensation lucas-doctrine lucas-v-south-carolina permitting property-rights regulatory-takings ripeness takings-clause
Key Terms:
Takings JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2024-09-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a regulatory takings claim seeking just compensation under Lucas may be defeated by the mere possibility that a permitting authority might have approved a smaller development proposal

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Lemon Bay Cove, LLC, sought permission from the United States Army Corps of Engineers to develop coastal property in Charlotte County, Florida. After soliciting public comment concerning the environmental impact of the proposed project, the Corps told Lemon Bay to look for a different parcel to develop. More than three years later, the Corps denied Lemon Bay’s permit application with prejudice. Lemon Bay sued, arguing that the denial of the permit deprived the land of all economically viable use and thus effected a per se taking under Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council, 505 U.S. 1003 (1992). The Court of Federal Claims held that Lemon Bay had not shown a denial of all economically viable use because it could have asked the Corps for permission to build a smaller development that might have been approved. The question presented is whether a regulatory takings claim seeking just compensation under Lucas may be defeated by the mere possibility that a permitting authority might have approved a smaller development proposal. ii LIST OF ALL PARTIES The Petitioner is Lemon Bay Cove, LLC. The Respondent is the United States.

Docket Entries

2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-09-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-09-05
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2024-09-05
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-08-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 5, 2024)
2024-06-26
Application (23A1004) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until August 2, 2024.
2024-06-21
Application (23A1004) to extend further the time from July 9, 2024 to August 2, 2024, submitted to The Chief Justice.
2024-05-13
Application (23A1004) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until July 9, 2024.
2024-05-07
Application (23A1004) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from June 4, 2024 to July 9, 2024, submitted to The Chief Justice.

Attorneys

Lemon Bay Cove, LLC
Christopher Matthew KieserPacific Legal Foundation, Petitioner
Christopher Matthew KieserPacific Legal Foundation, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent