| 23A1022 |
Ahmed Alahmedalabdaloklah v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
2024-05-17 |
Presumed Complete |
|
18-usc-844 courts-of-appeals criminal-statute extraterritorial-application foreign-citizen presumption-against-extraterritoriality |
Whether the presumption against extraterritoriality bars the application of a criminal statute to extraterritorial conduct by a foreign citizen under … |
| 23-971 |
Gary Waetzig v. Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. |
Tenth Circuit |
2024-03-06 |
Judgment Issued |
Amici (1)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
appellate-review civil-procedure courts-of-appeals final-judgment rule-41 rule-60(b) rule-60b voluntary-dismissal |
Whether a Rule 41 voluntary dismissal without prejudice is a 'final judgment, order, or proceeding' under Rule 60(b) |
| 23-6068 |
Jermaine Deshan West v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
2023-11-21 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
5th-amendment courts-of-appeals due-process empirical-evidence equal-protection fifth-amendment methamphetamine sentencing-disparities sentencing-guidelines |
Whether the U.S. Sentencing Commission abdicated its duties under 28 U.S.C. $994(2)(1)(B) when determining the appropriate amount of imprisonment Cour… |
| 23-5016 |
Jonathan Limbrick v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
2023-07-03 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
abuse-of-discretion courts-of-appeals criminal-procedure fair-and-just-reason fifth-circuit guilty-plea kercheval-v-united-states plea-withdrawal rule-11 |
Did the Fifth Circuit err in finding no abuse of discretion in denying motion to withdraw guilty plea? |
| 22-7237 |
Eric Grzywinski v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
2023-04-07 |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
age-of-consent circuit-split courts-of-appeals criminal-enhancement criminal-law esquivel-quintana-v-sessions minor-protection sexual-abuse sexual-offenses statutory-interpretation statutory-rape |
Whether a statutory rape offense requires a 16-year-old age of consent to be an 'offense relating to .. sexual abuse, aggravated sexual abuse, or abus… |
| 21-1524 |
Jesus Rivera v. Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division |
Fifth Circuit |
2022-06-03 |
Denied |
|
courts-of-appeals habeas-corpus judicial-review objectively-unreasonable precedent standard-of-review state-court unreasonable-manner |
What test should the Courts of Appeals employ to determine whether a state court writ of habeas corpus was decided in an objectively unreasonable mann… |
| 21-828 |
The Estate of Omar Fontana, et al. v. ACFB Administracao Judicial LTDA-ME |
Eleventh Circuit |
2021-12-03 |
Denied |
|
appellate-jurisdiction bankruptcy bankruptcy-finality chapter-15 courts-of-appeals discovery-order discrete-dispute finality ritzen-group-v-jackson-masonry |
Should the Court grant certiorari to resolve a conflict among the courts of appeals over whether a stand-alone discovery order entered in a Chapter-15… |
| 21-6105 |
Saul Hernandez-Serrano v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
2021-10-27 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
courts-of-appeals federal-sentencing molina-martinez-v-united-states numerical-range-of-imprisonment presumption-of-prejudice sentencing-guidelines |
Whether the presumption of prejudice recognized in Molina-Martinez v. United States extends to Federal Sentencing Guideline errors that do not affect … |
| 20-1438 |
Tina Cates v. Bruce D. Stroud, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2021-04-14 |
Denied |
Amici (2)Response RequestedRelisted (2) |
civil-rights constitutional-law courts-of-appeals due-process fourth-amendment legal-doctrine precedent qualified-immunity search-and-seizure standing |
Whether the unanimous conclusion of multiple other courts of appeals suffices to clearly establish the law for purposes of qualified immunity |
| 20-6808 |
Thomas Traficante v. United States |
Second Circuit |
2021-01-08 |
Denied |
IFP |
constitutional-challenge constitutional-challenges courts-of-appeals direct-appeal due-process ripeness risk-condition second-circuit sentencing-reform-act sentencing-review supervised-release |
Whether the Second Circuit Court of Appeals erred in denying Traficante's constitutional challenges to his risk condition of supervision as unripe on … |
| 20-554 |
Craig Eugene Smith v. James McKinney, Warden, et al. |
Eighth Circuit |
2020-10-27 |
Denied |
Response RequestedRelisted (2) |
atypical-and-significant-hardship atypical-hardship courts-of-appeals due-process fourteenth-amendment judicial-review liberty-interest prison-conditions wilkinson-v-austin |
Whether a court determining if a prisoner has suffered an 'atypical and significant' hardship must consider factors such as the duration of and justif… |
| 19-8144 |
Franco Nicholas Padgett v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
2020-03-30 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appellate-procedure concurrent-sentence-doctrine convictions courts-of-appeals federal-postconviction-motions federal-sentences federal-sentencing judicial-review postconviction-motion sentence-challenge sentences |
Whether the concurrent sentence doctrine applies to challenges to federal sentences when there is no challenge to a conviction |
| 19-6036 |
Arturo Eduardo Dominguez-Calderon v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
2019-09-24 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appellate-review courts-of-appeals criminal-procedure criminal-sentencing due-process holguin-hernandez-v-united-states judicial-discretion remand sentencing-factors sentencing-review substantive-reasonableness |
Whether substantive reasonableness review requires or permits the courts of appeals to 'reweigh the sentencing factors' |
| 19-373 |
James Walker v. United States |
Sixth Circuit |
2019-09-19 |
Granted |
Amici (7)Relisted (2) |
armed-career-criminal-act circuit-split courts-of-appeals criminal-offense mens-rea recklessness statutory-interpretation violent-felony |
Whether a criminal offense that can be committed with a mens rea of recklessness can qualify as a 'violent felony' under the Armed Career Criminal Act… |
| 18-9673 |
George Djura Jakubec v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
2019-06-14 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
924(c) bank-robbery categorical-approach circuit-split courts-of-appeals criminal-law criminal-procedure federal-bank-robbery hobbs-act legal-definition statutory-interpretation sufficiency-of-the-evidence |
Can the courts of appeals define the crime of federal bank robbery differently for purposes of a sufficiency-of-the-evidence challenge than for a cate… |
| 18-1362 |
James Hall v. John H. Merrill, Alabama Secretary of State |
Eleventh Circuit |
2019-04-30 |
Denied |
Amici (1) |
ballot-access capable-of-repetition class-action courts-of-appeals election election-law elections-mootness evading-review judicial-review mootness-doctrine standing |
Under what circumstances can a candidate continue to challenge a ballot-access rule after the election over which he originally sued has passed? |
| 18-8302 |
Dominique Dontae Lasker v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
2019-03-06 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
18-usc-924(c) bank-robbery categorical-approach courts-of-appeals crime-of-violence criminal-law federal-bank-robbery federal-crime intimidation legal-definition specific-intent statutory-interpretation sufficiency-of-the-evidence |
Can the courts of appeals define the crime of federal bank robbery differently for purposes of a sufficiency-of-the-evidence challenge than for a cate… |
| 18-8266 |
Tamim Abdul-Samad, aka Tamin Abdul-Samad, aka Brandon Harris v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
2019-03-04 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
18-usc-924c 924(c) bank-robbery career-offender categorical-approach courts-of-appeals criminal-law federal-bank-robbery federal-crime intimidation legal-definition statutory-interpretation sufficiency-of-evidence |
Can the courts of appeals define the crime of federal bank robbery differently for purposes of a sufficiency-of-the-evidence challenge than for a cate… |
| 18-8256 |
Mustafa Ahmad Naushad v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
2019-03-04 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
18-usc-2113 18-usc-924(c) bank-robbery categorical-approach courts-of-appeals criminal-law federal-bank-robbery judicial-discretion legal-definition specific-intent statutory-interpretation sufficiency-of-the-evidence violent-physical-force |
Can the courts of appeals define the crime of federal bank robbery differently for purposes of a sufficiency-of-the-evidence challenge than for a cate… |
| 18-8155 |
Benjamin E. Smith v. Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
2019-02-27 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
actual-innocence constitutional-right constitutional-rights courts-of-appeals criminal-procedure due-process federal-courts federal-habeas federal-habeas-corpus federal-prisoner habeas-corpus legal-scholars standing state-prisoner |
Does a state and/or federal prisoner have a constitutional right to raise a freestanding claim of actual innocence, in a federal habeas corpus proceed… |
| 18-7857 |
Calvin Raymond Jones v. United States |
Sixth Circuit |
2019-02-08 |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
circuit-split civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-concerns courts-of-appeals criminal-procedure due-process retribution sentencing supervised-release |
Whether a district court commits reversible error by imposing a sentence for a supervised release violation for the purpose of retribution |
| 18-941 |
Carl B. Davis, Chapter 13 Trustee v. Tyson Prepared Foods, Inc. |
Tenth Circuit |
2019-01-18 |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (3) |
automatic-stay bankruptcy bankruptcy-estate circuit-split courts-of-appeals creditor creditor-rights passive-conduct property-interest property-interests property-of-the-estate statutory-interpretation |
Should the Court grant certiorari to resolve an entrenched and acknowledged conflict among the courts of appeals over whether section 362(a) applies t… |
| 18-472 |
Behr Dayton Thermal Products LLC, et al. v. Terry Martin, et al. |
Sixth Circuit |
2018-10-12 |
Denied |
Amici (1)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
appellate-conflict civil-procedure class-certification courts-of-appeals federal-civil-procedure federal-rules-of-civil-procedure issue-certification issue-classes predominance predominance-requirement rule-23 rule-23(b)(3) rule-23(c)(4) |
Whether plaintiffs can obtain certification of issue classes under Rule 23(c)(4) despite failing to demonstrate predominance under Rule 23(b)(3) |