No. 18-9673

George Djura Jakubec v. United States

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-06-14
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP Experienced Counsel
Tags: 924(c) bank-robbery categorical-approach circuit-split courts-of-appeals criminal-law criminal-procedure federal-bank-robbery hobbs-act legal-definition statutory-interpretation sufficiency-of-the-evidence
Key Terms:
Takings HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Can the courts of appeals define the crime of federal bank robbery differently for purposes of a sufficiency-of-the-evidence challenge than for a categorical-approach challenge?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Can the courts of appeals define the crime of federal bank robbery differently for purposes of a challenge than for a challenge? prefix

Docket Entries

2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-06-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-06-21
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2019-06-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 15, 2019)

Attorneys

George Djura Jakubec
Kara Lee HartzlerFederal Defenders of San Diego, Inc., Petitioner
United States of America
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent