No. 19-6036

Arturo Eduardo Dominguez-Calderon v. United States

Lower Court: Fifth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-09-24
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP Experienced Counsel
Tags: appellate-review courts-of-appeals criminal-procedure criminal-sentencing due-process holguin-hernandez-v-united-states judicial-discretion remand sentencing-factors sentencing-review substantive-reasonableness
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities
Latest Conference: 2019-11-08
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether substantive reasonableness review requires or permits the courts of appeals to 'reweigh the sentencing factors'

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1. Whether substantive reasonableness review requires or permits the courts of appeals to “reweigh the sentencing factors”? SUBSIDIARY QUESTION: Whether the Court should hold the case pending the resolution of Holguin-Hernandez v. United States, No. 18-7739, 2019 WL 429919, _8.Ct._,__U.S.__ (June 3, 2019)(granting certiorari), and potentially grant certiorari, vacate the judgment below, and remand in light of that case? il PARTIES Arturo Eduardo Dominguez-Calderon is the Petitioner, who was the defendantappellant below. The United States of America is the Respondent, who was the plaintiff-appellee below. iii

Docket Entries

2019-11-12
Petition DENIED.
2019-10-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/8/2019.
2019-10-16
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-09-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 24, 2019)

Attorneys

Arturo Eduardo Dominguez-Calderon
Kevin Joel PageOffice of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
Kevin Joel PageOffice of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent