No. 20-6808
Thomas Traficante v. United States
IFP
Tags: constitutional-challenge constitutional-challenges courts-of-appeals direct-appeal due-process ripeness risk-condition second-circuit sentencing-reform-act sentencing-review supervised-release
Key Terms:
Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2021-05-13
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Second Circuit Court of Appeals erred in denying Traficante's constitutional challenges to his risk condition of supervision as unripe on direct appeal
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED Whether the Second Circuit Court of Appeals erred, in violation of U.S. Const. V and Congress’ intent to provide a streamlined scheme of sentencing review established by the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984, when it denied Traficante’s constitutional challenges to his risk condition of supervision as unripe on direct appeal, and departing from the majority view among Courts of Appeals’ decisions that have examined similar issues? il
Docket Entries
2021-05-17
Petition DENIED.
2021-04-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/13/2021.
2021-04-23
Reply of petitioner Thomas Traficante filed.
2021-04-09
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2021-02-26
Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 10, 2021 to April 9, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-02-26
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including April 9, 2021.
2021-02-03
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including March 10, 2021.
2021-02-02
Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 8, 2021 to March 10, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-12-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 8, 2021)
Attorneys
Thomas Traficante
Michelle Barth — Law Office of Michelle Anderson Barth, Petitioner
Michelle Barth — Law Office of Michelle Anderson Barth, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent