No. 21-1222

Joel David Joseph v. American General Life Insurance Company

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2022-03-09
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Tags: california-constitution diversity-jurisdiction erie-doctrine judicial-procedure ninth-circuit oral-argument res-judicata ripeness
Key Terms:
Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2022-05-12
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does the Erie doctrine require oral argument in a diversity case under the California Constitution?

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Does this court’s decision in Erie Railroad v. : Tompkins, 304 U.S. 64 (1938), require the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit to ; conduct oral argument in a diversity case under . the California Constitution which requires oral argument on appeal? 2. Does res judicata apply to an earlier proceeding ~ when the earlier case was not ripe for adjudication? i

Docket Entries

2022-05-16
Petition DENIED.
2022-04-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/12/2022.
2022-03-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 8, 2022)

Attorneys

Joel Joseph
Joel David Joseph — Petitioner
Joel David Joseph — Petitioner