| 22-7005 |
Lino Alberto Chavez v. Kris Mayes, Attorney General of Arizona, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2023-03-13 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
aedpa-deference anders-review anders-v-california federal-review habeas-corpus indigent-appeals post-conviction-relief smith-v-robbins state-court-procedure state-court-procedures |
Whether the district court must apply AEDPA deference to a state court decision that Anders review is not required in a Rule 32 proceeding |
| 20-6210 |
Deondre Arthur Staten v. Ronald Davis, Warden |
Ninth Circuit |
2020-11-04 |
Denied |
IFP |
federal-deference habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel prima-facie-case state-court-procedure state-court-procedures strickland-standard strickland-v-washington |
Whether federal court deference to state court summary disposition of habeas claims includes deference to state court's established process and proced… |
| 20-5684 |
Frank Joseph Schwindler v. Shay Hatcher, Warden |
Eleventh Circuit |
2020-09-14 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-rights due-process exhaustion-of-remedies federal-courts federal-review habeas-corpus jurisdiction standing state-court-procedures state-courts venue |
Whether the U.S. Court of Appeals lacked jurisdiction to review the district court's orders staying a habeas corpus petition |
| 19-6374 |
Kim Moss v. Michigan |
Michigan |
2019-10-25 |
Denied |
IFP |
appeal appeal-of-right appellate-procedure consolidation constitutional-rights constitutional-rights-to-appeal constitutional-violation due-process ineffective-assistance-of-counsel procedural-delay right-to-appeal state-court-procedures state-procedures trial-court-error |
Was Petitioner Moss' constitutional right to appeal violated where the trial court failed to reinstate his appeal of right? |
| 18-8656 |
Geneva Elaine Hames v. Patricia Yeldell, Warden |
Fourth Circuit |
2019-04-01 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
administrative-law civil-rights constitutional-law due-process equal-protection standing civil-rights due-process federal-jurisdiction habeas-corpus standing state-court-procedures |
Whether the denial of a constitutional right is permissible when a state court sets up a procedural bar to prevent review of the constitutional claim |
| 18-294 |
Nicholas Honchariw v. County of Stanislaus, California, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2018-09-07 |
GVR |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (3) |
due-process final-determination ripeness state-court-procedures subdivision subdivision-approval taking-claims takings takings-clause williamson-county |
Whether taking and due process claims arising from a subdivision disapproval ripen under Williamson County Regional Planning Commission et al. v. Hami… |
| 18-5141 |
Taylor Don Frederiksen v. Texas |
Texas |
2018-07-05 |
Denied |
IFP |
appeal appellate-procedure collateral-consequences court-standards criminal-procedure due-process ineffective-assistance judicial-review legal-argument prejudice procedural-rules right-to-appeal right-to-counsel state-court-procedures state-court-rules |
Whether Mr. Frederiksen should continue to suffer prejudice and collateral legal consequences from his uncounseled conviction when the lower state cou… |