No. 19-6374

Kim Moss v. Michigan

Lower Court: Michigan
Docketed: 2019-10-25
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: appeal appeal-of-right appellate-procedure consolidation constitutional-rights constitutional-rights-to-appeal constitutional-violation due-process ineffective-assistance-of-counsel procedural-delay right-to-appeal state-court-procedures state-procedures trial-court-error
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2020-01-10
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Was Petitioner Moss' constitutional right to appeal violated where the trial court failed to reinstate his appeal of right?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED This case arise where Petitioner lost his Appeal of Right do to Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel and once it was determine by the State Courts that Petitioner lost his Appeal of Right the Courts failed to reinstate that Right and prolonged that lost Right to Appeal through State procedures for More then 35 years ; WAS PETITIONER MOSS CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO APPEAL VIOLATED WHERE THE TRIAL COURT FAILED TO REINSTATE HIS APPEAL OF RIGHT: II IS THERE TWO FORMS OF CONSOLIDATION ONE BASED ON THE CONSTITUTION, THE OTHER BASED ON NONCONSTITUTIONAL GROUNDS AND IS ONE AFFORDED A GREATER DEGREE OF PROTECTION THEN THE OTHER

Docket Entries

2020-01-13
Petition DENIED.
2019-12-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2020.
2019-10-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 25, 2019)

Attorneys

Kim Moss
Kim Moss — Petitioner
Kim Moss — Petitioner