| 24-5137 |
Gerardo Ogaz v. Texas |
Texas |
2024-07-25 |
Denied |
IFP |
anders-v-california appeal-process case-remand civil-procedure court-procedure due-process frivolous-appeal judicial-review legal-interpretation procedural-rules remand standing |
Did the Court err Concluding at Frivolous was the aPpeal in accordance wilh Anders ¥. California 386 U.S, #38 C96) When it Was oresented yout a mirror… |
| 22-7579 |
Keith Grant Schneider v. Florida |
Florida |
2023-05-17 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
anders-brief anders-v-california appellate-procedure appellate-review constitutional-right counsel-appointment due-process habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel post-conviction-relief sixth-amendment |
Whether the appellate court has a duty to conduct a full review of the record under Anders v. California when appointed counsel files an Anders brief … |
| 22-7005 |
Lino Alberto Chavez v. Kris Mayes, Attorney General of Arizona, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2023-03-13 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
aedpa-deference anders-review anders-v-california federal-review habeas-corpus indigent-appeals post-conviction-relief smith-v-robbins state-court-procedure state-court-procedures |
Whether the district court must apply AEDPA deference to a state court decision that Anders review is not required in a Rule 32 proceeding |
| 22-5871 |
Timothy Steel v. Dan Winkleski, Warden |
Seventh Circuit |
2022-10-19 |
Denied |
IFP |
anders-v-california constitutional-error direct-appeal due-process habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel statute-of-limitations writ-of-certiorari |
Is a petitioner entitled to effective assistance of successor counsel to file a 2254 writ of habeas corpus despite the statute of limitations |
| 21-7710 |
Hernandez Lopaz Daniels v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
2022-04-26 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
anders-v-california appellate-review counsel-withdrawal due-process eleventh-circuit frivolous-appeal frivolous-case meaningful-review |
Whether counsel can withdraw without finding the case to be 'wholly frivolous' as required by Anders v. California |
| 19-5234 |
Stephen P. Dowdney, Jr. v. Washington |
Washington |
2019-07-18 |
Denied |
IFP |
anders-procedure anders-v-california appellate-review direct-appeal due-process effective-assistance-counsel effective-assistance-of-counsel equal-protection mccoy-v-court-of-appeals |
Does Washington state use the Anders v. California procedure to circumvent a meaningful direct (first) appeal, effective assistance of counsel, due pr… |
| 18-8690 |
Dagoberto Ontiveros v. Michael Pacheco, Warden, et al. |
Tenth Circuit |
2019-04-08 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
anders-appeal anders-v-california appellate-review constitutional-law criminal-procedure defendant-rights direct-appeal due-process legal-ethics legal-frivolity right-to-counsel |
Whether a finding of frivolity is required when rejecting a criminal defendant's direct appeal under Anders v. California |
| 18-5117 |
Glendrict Frazier v. United States |
Fourth Circuit |
2018-07-05 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
anders-motion anders-v-california appellate-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rule criminal-procedure direct-appeal direct-review due-process habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance retroactivity |
Did the Appeals Court Follow the Ruling in Griffith v. Kentucky, 479 U.S. 314, 328, 107 S.Ct. 708 (1987) (holding that on direct review a new constitu… |