anders-v-california
8 cases — ← All topics
| Case | Title | Lower Court | Docketed | Status | Flags | Tags | Question Presented |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24-5137 | Gerardo Ogaz v. Texas | Texas | 2024-07-25 | Denied | IFP | anders-v-california appeal-process case-remand civil-procedure court-procedure due-process frivolous-appeal judicial-review legal-interpretation procedural-rules remand standing | "Did the Court err concluding the appeal was frivolous when the appeal in accordance with 38 U.S.C. § 38 (CMT) when it was presented to a mirror publi… |
| 22-7579 | Keith Grant Schneider v. Florida | Florida | 2023-05-17 | Denied | Response WaivedIFP | anders-brief anders-v-california appellate-procedure appellate-review constitutional-right counsel-appointment due-process habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel post-conviction-relief sixth-amendment | Where the initial review collateral proceeding is the first designated proceeding for a prisoner to raise a claim of infective assistance of counsel a… |
| 22-7005 | Lino Alberto Chavez v. Kris Mayes, Attorney General of Arizona, et al. | Ninth Circuit | 2023-03-13 | Denied | Response WaivedIFP | aedpa-deference anders-review anders-v-california federal-review habeas-corpus indigent-appeals post-conviction-relief smith-v-robbins state-court-procedure state-court-procedures | 1. When a state court decision holds that "no Anders-type review is required" in an instance in which all parties concede that Anders applies, and no … |
| 22-5871 | Timothy Steel v. Dan Winkleski, Warden | Seventh Circuit | 2022-10-19 | Denied | IFP | anders-v-california constitutional-error direct-appeal due-process habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel statute-of-limitations writ-of-certiorari | 1. IS THE PETITIONER ENTITLED TO BE PROVIDED THE EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF SUCCESSOR COUNSEL IN ACCORD WITH DUE PROCESS OF LAW, THEREBY OVERCOMING THE O… |
| 21-7710 | Hernandez Lopaz Daniels v. United States | Eleventh Circuit | 2022-04-26 | Denied | Response WaivedIFP | anders-v-california appellate-review counsel-withdrawal due-process eleventh-circuit frivolous-appeal frivolous-case meaningful-review | I. IN COMPLIANCE WITH ANDERS V. CALIFORINA, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), CAN COUNSEL SIMPLY WITHDRAW WITHOUT FINDING THE CASE TO BE "WHOLLY FRIVOLOUS" AS REQU… |
| 19-5234 | Stephen P. Dowdney, Jr. v. Washington | Washington | 2019-07-18 | Denied | IFP | anders-procedure anders-v-california appellate-review direct-appeal due-process effective-assistance-counsel effective-assistance-of-counsel equal-protection mccoy-v-court-of-appeals | 1. DOES WASHINGTON STATE USE THE ANDERS v. CALIFORNIA (386 U.S. 738) PROCEDURE TO CIRCUMVENT A MEANINGFUL DIRECT (FIRST) APPEAL, EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE … |
| 18-8690 | Dagoberto Ontiveros v. Michael Pacheco, Warden, et al. | Tenth Circuit | 2019-04-08 | Denied | Response WaivedIFP | anders-appeal anders-v-california appellate-review constitutional-law criminal-procedure defendant-rights direct-appeal due-process legal-ethics legal-frivolity right-to-counsel | When rejecting a criminal defendant's direct appeal under the provisions of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967… |
| 18-5117 | Glendrict Frazier v. United States | Fourth Circuit | 2018-07-05 | Denied | Response WaivedIFP | anders-motion anders-v-california appellate-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rule criminal-procedure direct-appeal direct-review due-process habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance retroactivity | Did the Appeals Court Follow the Ruling in Griffith v. Kentucky, 479 U.S. 314, 328, 107 S.Ct. 708 (1987)(holding that on direct review a new constitut… |