No. 18-5117

Glendrict Frazier v. United States

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2018-07-05
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: anders-motion anders-v-california appellate-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rule criminal-procedure direct-appeal direct-review due-process habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance retroactivity
Key Terms:
Immigration
Latest Conference: 2018-09-24
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the Appeals Court Follow the Ruling in Griffith v. Kentucky, 479 U.S. 314, 328, 107 S.Ct. 708 (1987) (holding that on direct review a new constitutional rule must be applied retroactively to all cases not yet final)

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . Did the Appeals Court Follow the Ruling in Griffith v. Kentucky, 479 U.S. 314, 328, 107 S.Ct. 708 (1987) (holding that on direct review a new constitutional rule must be applied retroactively "to : all cases not yet final") When attorney explained that in his . opinion there were no non frivolous grounds for appeal under . Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)

Docket Entries

2018-10-01
Petition DENIED.
2018-07-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
2018-07-12
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2017-12-27
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 6, 2018)

Attorneys

Glendrict Frazier
Glendrict Frazier — Petitioner
Glendrict Frazier — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent