| 24-5857 |
Dimas Deleon Rios v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
2024-10-30 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appellate-review certificate-of-appealability judicial-explanation meaningful-review petitioner-rights procedural-due-process |
Does an appellate court have an obligation to provide sufficient explanation for denying a certificate of appealability to enable a petitioner to seek… |
| 23-7530 |
Deandre Lenier Neal-Hill v. United States |
Eighth Circuit |
2024-05-22 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appeals certificate-of-appealability civil-rights constitutional-right due-process federal-courts habeas-corpus meaningful-review merits-denial procedural-denial reasonable-jurists standing |
whether-certificate-of-appealability-denial-requires-explanation |
| 23-6442 |
Pedro Hernandez Zarate v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
2024-01-09 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appellate-review court-of-appeals due-process en-banc-hearing meaningful-review statutory-right statutory-right-to-appeal writ-of-certiorari |
Whether due process and the statutory right to appeal require the Court of Appeals to adequately explain the decisions made in a defendant's case in o… |
| 22-6776 |
J. Doe v. Design Review Board of the Town of Sullivan's Island, et al. |
South Carolina |
2023-02-14 |
Denied |
IFP |
amendment-violation appellate-review civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process fifth-amendment first-amendment fourteenth-amendment judicial-procedure meaningful-review procedural-due-process seventh-amendment |
Whether review should be granted where no other review was available and whether the lower appellate court denied meaningful review and other substant… |
| 22-42 |
Dipendra Tiwari, et al. v. Eric Friedlander, Secretary, Kentucky Cabinet for Health and Family Services, et al. |
Sixth Circuit |
2022-07-14 |
Denied |
Amici (7) |
civil-rights constitutional-protection due-process economic-liberty fourteenth-amendment individual-liberty meaningful-review occupation-rights occupational-licensing rational-basis-review substantive-due-process |
Does the Fourteenth Amendment require meaningful review of restrictions on the right to engage in a common occupation? |
| 21-7710 |
Hernandez Lopaz Daniels v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
2022-04-26 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
anders-v-california appellate-review counsel-withdrawal due-process eleventh-circuit frivolous-appeal frivolous-case meaningful-review |
Whether counsel can withdraw without finding the case to be 'wholly frivolous' as required by Anders v. California |
| 21-455 |
Mark's Engine Company No. 28 Restaurant, LLC v. Superior Court of California, Los Angeles County, et al. |
California |
2021-09-24 |
Denied |
|
civil-rights constitutional-review due-process emergency-powers first-amendment jacobson-precedent jacobson-v-massachusetts meaningful-review narrow-tailoring public-health public-health-crisis |
Whether the appellate court's decision improperly expands the holding set forth in Jacobson v. Massachusetts |
| 21-5206 |
S. J., Mother of A. C. and A. W., Each a Minor Child v. Department of Children and Families |
Florida |
2021-07-23 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appellate-counsel civil-procedure due-process equal-protection indigent indigent-representation meaningful-review parental-rights |
Whether an indigent Mother whose parental rights are terminated is denied equal protection and due process of law |
| 20-8274 |
RaySean D. Barber v. Scott R. Frakes, Director, Nebraska Department of Correctional Services, et al. |
Eighth Circuit |
2021-06-10 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights complaint-deficiencies district-court due-process equal-protection indigent-claims leave-to-amend meaningful-review prisoner-claims standing |
Whether the district court's finding with regard to Mr. Barber's equal-protection-claim conflicted with this-Court's-governing-determinations |
| 20-7137 |
Jerald Dean Godwin v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
2021-02-12 |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
28-usc-2255 appellate-review bank-robbery crime-of-violence crimes-of-violence criminal-procedure due-process fundamental-fairness habeas-corpus meaningful-review section-2255 |
Does the Eleventh Circuit's practice of applying published panel orders as binding precedent deprive inmates of due process? |
| 20-6600 |
Throne Thomas Smiley v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
2020-12-10 |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (3)IFP |
collateral-review criminal-defendant due-process eleventh-circuit fundamental-fairness meaningful-review panel-order second-or-successive-2255-motion section-2255 truncated-time-frame without-adversarial-testing |
Does the Eleventh Circuit's practice of applying published panel orders—issued in the context of an application for leave to file a second or successi… |
| 20-6509 |
Milas Antwon Grant, III v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
2020-12-02 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
collateral-review criminal-defendant due-process eleventh-circuit fundamental-fairness meaningful-review panel-order second-or-successive-2255-motion section-2255-motion truncated-time-frame without-adversarial-testing |
Does the Eleventh Circuit's practice of applying published panel orders—issued in the context of an application for leave to file a second or successi… |
| 20-5873 |
Tario Stamps v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
2020-10-02 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
binding-precedent due-process eleventh-circuit fundamental-fairness judicial-review meaningful-review panel-order second-or-successive-2255-motion section-2255 truncated-time-frame without-adversarial-testing |
Does the Eleventh Circuit's practice of applying published panel orders—issued in the context of an application for leave to file a second or successi… |
| 20-5878 |
Renard Cortez Murray v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
2020-10-01 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
due-process eleventh-circuit fundamental-fairness judicial-review meaningful-review panel-order precedent second-or-successive-2255-motion section-2255 truncated-time-frame without-adversarial-testing |
Does the Eleventh Circuit's practice of applying published panel orders—issued in the context of an application for leave to file a second or successi… |
| 19-8737 |
James Steiner v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
2020-06-17 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
18-usc-924(c) aiding-and-abetting crime-of-violence due-process eleventh-circuit fundamental-fairness johnson-claim judicial-review meaningful-review rosemond-claim section-2255 |
Whether the 11th Circuit's holding can be reconciled with Rosemond |
| 19-8072 |
Saul Cervantes v. M. D. Biter, Warden |
Ninth Circuit |
2020-03-23 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
actual-innocence certificate-of-appealability due-process fifth-amendment habeas-corpus meaningful-review schlup-standard |
Whether petitioner established actual innocence to overcome the untimeliness of his habeas corpus petition |
| 19-7527 |
Marcus Rashawn Smith v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
2020-02-03 |
Denied |
IFP |
appellate-procedure binding-precedent due-process fundamental-fairness habeas-corpus judicial-review meaningful-review precedent-rule second-or-successive-2255 second-or-successive-2255-motion section-2255 truncated-time-frame without-adversarial-testing |
Does the Eleventh Circuit's practice of applying published panel orders—issued in the context of an application for leave to file a second or successi… |
| 19-6278 |
Kenneth Lyle Spangle v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
2019-10-17 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
18-usc-2113 18-usc-924 arbitrary-and-capricious bank-robbery categorical-approach certificate-of-appealability crime-of-violence due-process federal-bank-robbery fifth-amendment meaningful-review |
Whether the Circuit's decision to deny a certificate of appealability without any analysis or explanation for its decision at all was so arbitrary and… |
| 19-468 |
Keesha Elayne Frye v. United States |
Fourth Circuit |
2019-10-09 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
appellate-review burden-of-proof criminal-procedure due-process indictment indictment-redaction jury jury-deliberation jury-instructions meaningful-review redaction standard-of-review |
Whether the criminal defendant was denied meaningful appellate review when the district court destroyed the only copy of a redacted indictment used by… |