No. 24-5857
Dimas Deleon Rios v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review certificate-of-appealability judicial-explanation meaningful-review petitioner-rights procedural-due-process
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2024-12-06
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does an appellate court have an obligation to provide sufficient explanation for denying a certificate of appealability to enable a petitioner to seek meaningful review of that decision?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED Petitioner Dimas DeLeon Rios presents the following question for review: Does an appellate court have an obligation to provide sufficient explanation for denying a certificate of appealability to enable a petitioner to seek meaningful review of that decision? i J ~ ZL
Docket Entries
2024-12-09
Petition DENIED.
2024-11-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/6/2024.
2024-11-04
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2024-11-04
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-10-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 29, 2024)
2024-08-06
Application (24A134) granted by Justice Alito extending the time to file until October 13, 2024.
2024-08-02
Application (24A134) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from August 14, 2024 to October 13, 2024, submitted to Justice Alito.
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent