No. 23-7530

Deandre Lenier Neal-Hill v. United States

Lower Court: Eighth Circuit
Docketed: 2024-05-22
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appeals certificate-of-appealability civil-rights constitutional-right due-process federal-courts habeas-corpus meaningful-review merits-denial procedural-denial reasonable-jurists standing
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2024-09-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)

whether-certificate-of-appealability-denial-requires-explanation

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Whether, under this Court's holdings, in Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322 (2008), and Buck v. Davis, 580 U.S. 100 (2017), it is inadequate for a Court of Appeals to merely deny an application for Certificate of Appealability, without stating whether the denial is procedural, or on the merits, thereby preventing meaningful review. Especially when the applicant made a substantial showing of the denial of a Const#tutional ' right, by showing as to each issue that reasonable jurists would find the District Court's ruling debatable or wrong. “

Docket Entries

2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-06-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-06-03
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-05-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 21, 2024)

Attorneys

Deandre L. Neal-Hill
Deandre Lenier Neal-Hill — Petitioner
Deandre Lenier Neal-Hill — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent