No. 23-7530
Deandre Lenier Neal-Hill v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appeals certificate-of-appealability civil-rights constitutional-right due-process federal-courts habeas-corpus meaningful-review merits-denial procedural-denial reasonable-jurists standing
Latest Conference:
2024-09-30
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether, under this Court's holdings, in Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537
U.S. 322 (2008), and Buck v. Davis, 580 U.S. 100 (2017), it is inadequate
for a Court of Appeals to merely deny an application for Certificate of
Appealability, without stating whether the denial is procedural, or on
the merits, thereby preventing meaningful review. Especially when the
applicant made a substantial showing of the denial of a Constitutional
right, by showing as to each issue that reasonable jurists would find
the District Court's ruling debatable or wrong.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
whether-certificate-of-appealability-denial-requires-explanation
Docket Entries
2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-06-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-06-03
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-05-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 21, 2024)
Attorneys
Deandre L. Neal-Hill
Deandre Lenier Neal-Hill — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Respondent