| 25-6335 |
Jake Paul Heiney v. Ashley Richardson, Director, Lucas County Adult Probation Department, et al. |
Sixth Circuit |
2025-12-10 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
certificate-of-appealability district-court evidentiary-review habeas-corpus reasonable-jurists state-court-record |
Whether a district court must review evidence in the state-court record when the habeas petitioner alleges it demonstrates that the state court unreas… |
| 25-5876 |
William Housman v. Laurel Harry, Secretary, Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, et al. |
Third Circuit |
2025-10-14 |
Denied |
IFP |
appellate-procedure certificate-of-appealability federal-constitutional-claim judicial-review reasonable-jurists state-court-decision |
Does a state court's divided decision on the merits of a federal constitutional claim demonstrate that reasonable jurists would debate the claim's mer… |
| 25-5760 |
Darval Ledet v. Keith Cooley, Warden |
Fifth Circuit |
2025-09-30 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
constitutional-right district-court habeas-corpus miller-el reasonable-jurists slack-standard |
Whether Ledet made a substantial showing of denial of a constitutional right under MillerEl v. Cockrell, such that reasonable jurists would find the d… |
| 24-7454 |
William Demont White, Jr. v. Lisa Stenseth, Warden |
Eighth Circuit |
2025-06-18 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
28-usc-2253 certificate-of-appealability federal-court habeas-corpus procedural-grounds reasonable-jurists |
Whether a federal court may find that 'reasonable jurists would not disagree' about denying a certificate of appealability when other courts have reso… |
| 24-7212 |
Dequarn Markeyth Bell v. Lisa Stenseth, Warden |
Eighth Circuit |
2025-05-15 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
28-usc-2253 certificate-of-appealability federal-court habeas-corpus reasonable-jurists statutory-interpretation |
Whether a federal court may find that 'reasonable jurists would not disagree' with the denial of habeas relief when other courts have resolved similar… |
| 24-939 |
Kendall Streb v. United States |
Eighth Circuit |
2025-03-03 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
certificate-of-appealability habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance plea-bargaining reasonable-jurists sentencing-guidelines |
Is the 'reasonable jurists' test being administered faithfully and consistently across federal circuits, and do Lafler, Frye, and Padilla precedents r… |
| 23-7558 |
Marcus Jones v. United States |
Eighth Circuit |
2024-05-24 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appellate-procedure certificate-of-appealability constitutional-rights district-court-ruling judicial-review merits-denial merits-determination procedural-denial reasonable-jurists |
whether-court-of-appeals-denial-of-certificate-of-appealability |
| 23-7530 |
Deandre Lenier Neal-Hill v. United States |
Eighth Circuit |
2024-05-22 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appeals certificate-of-appealability civil-rights constitutional-right due-process federal-courts habeas-corpus meaningful-review merits-denial procedural-denial reasonable-jurists standing |
whether-certificate-of-appealability-denial-requires-explanation |
| 22-7589 |
Troy G. Saxton v. Jay Forshey, Warden |
Sixth Circuit |
2023-05-18 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
28-usc-2253 brown-v-ohio certificate-of-appealability double-jeopardy drug-possession habeas habeas-corpus reasonable-jurists spatial-units |
Whether a habeas petitioner satisfies his burden under 28 U.S.C. §2253(c)(2) for the issuance of a certificate of appealability |
| 22-7052 |
Colby Todd Dubose v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
2023-03-21 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
categorical-approach certificate-of-appealability generic-burglary non-permanent-structures oregon-first-degree-burglary overnight-accommodation reasonable-jurists statutory-interpretation stitt-decision stitt-v-united-states |
Whether Oregon first-degree burglary remains categorically broader than generic burglary after Stitt because it covers non-permanent and mobile struct… |
| 22-6667 |
Robert Henry Steele v. Dan Redington |
Eighth Circuit |
2023-01-31 |
Denied |
IFP |
appellate-procedure certificate-of-appealability due-process eighth-circuit habeas-corpus judicial-review procedural-standard reasonable-jurists standard-of-review summary-reversal |
Whether this Court should summarily reverse the Eighth Circuit's denial of a COA where the underlying issues were clearly debatable by jurists of reas… |
| 22-507 |
Tyson Martin v. Ricky D. Dixon, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections |
Eleventh Circuit |
2022-11-30 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
28-usc-2253 certificate-of-appealability due-process federal-procedure habeas-corpus judicial-review miller-el-standard miller-el-v-cockrell reasonabl-jurists-debate reasonable-jurists |
Whether the court of appeals improperly denied the Petitioner a certificate of appealability |
| 22-5850 |
Justin Michael Fenney v. Tracy Beltz, Warden |
Eighth Circuit |
2022-10-18 |
Denied |
IFP |
2253-statute 28-usc-2253 appellate-relief certificate-of-appealability conviction factual-support federal-court-review habeas-corpus judicial-discretion reasonable-jurists |
Whether a federal court may find that 'reasonable jurists would not disagree' about the denial of relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2253 where there is no fact… |
| 22-304 |
Frank Oswald v. Nicholas Mauer, et al. |
Sixth Circuit |
2022-09-29 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
appellate-procedure certificate-of-appealability constitutional-claims constitutional-rights due-process habeas-corpus judicial-review reasonable-jurists sixth-circuit |
Does a Circuit Court's denial of an application for a Certificate of Appealability based on the merits of the appeal, rather than on whether reasonabl… |
| 22-5557 |
David Laurence Hodges v. William Bolin, Warden |
Eighth Circuit |
2022-09-13 |
Denied |
IFP |
28-usc-2253 certificate-of-appealability due-process federal-court federal-courts habeas-corpus judicial-discretion reasonable-jurists statutory-interpretation |
Whether a federal court may find that 'reasonable jurists would not disagree' about the denial of relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2253 where other courts hav… |
| 22-5291 |
Barton Ray Gaines v. Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division |
Fifth Circuit |
2022-08-04 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-procedure constitutional-rights due-process federal-courts habeas-corpus judicial-review reasonable-jurists recusal rule-60b-motion standard-of-review substantial-showing |
Whether GAINES made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right |
| 22-5024 |
Jerod Rodriguez v. Ricky D. Dixon, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections |
Eleventh Circuit |
2022-07-05 |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
certificate-of-appealability criminal-procedure guilty-verdict ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel miller-el-v-cockrell mistrial postconviction-relief prejudice-prong reasonable-jurists sixth-amendment strickland-standard |
whether-strickland-prejudice-prong-established |
| 21-8137 |
David Lee Green v. Ricky D. Dixon, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections |
Eleventh Circuit |
2022-06-14 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
28-usc-2253 certificate-of-appealability criminal-procedure entrapment ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel miller-el-v-cockrell reasonable-jurists sixth-amendment strategic-decision undercover-operation |
Whether an attorney's decision to forego a viable defense can be considered 'strategic' if the attorney misunderstood the law |
| 21-7995 |
Joseph Kurz v. Tim Hooper, Warden |
Fifth Circuit |
2022-05-27 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
constitutional-amendments criminal-procedure due-process effective-assistance-of-counsel ex-post-facto fifth-circuit fourteenth-amendment reasonable-jurists sixth-amendment |
Whether reasonable jurists would determine there was sufficient evidence to support convictions |
| 21-7928 |
Timothy Lindsey v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
2022-05-20 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
28-usc-2255 acca-enhanced-sentence acca-enhancement circuit-split gatekeeping-standard generic-burglary johnson-motion johnson-v-united-states reasonable-jurists subject-matter-jurisdiction successive-motion |
Did the district court have jurisdiction to consider Mr. Lindsey's authorized motion? |
| 21-7297 |
Jaime B. Garcia v. Warren L. Montgomery, Warden |
Ninth Circuit |
2022-03-07 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
certificate-of-appealability criminal-procedure due-process first-degree-murder habeas-corpus jury-instructions legal-theory prosecutorial-concession reasonable-jurists standard-of-review |
Whether a certificate of appealability should have been issued when the jury was instructed on an invalid legal theory to convict the petitioner of fi… |
| 21-7274 |
Kaleb L. Basey v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
2022-03-03 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
18-usc-2703 digital-privacy electronic-communications email-preservation fourth-amendment probable-cause reasonable-jurists search-and-seizure warrantless-search |
Whether reasonable jurists could disagree with the district court's decision that the initial and continuous, nine-month warrantless preservation of B… |
| 21-6520 |
Mark J. Zimny v. United States |
First Circuit |
2021-12-06 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appeal appellate-court due-process motion-for-summary-disposition reasonable-jurists substantial-question summary-disposition supreme-court-precedent |
Did an appellate court contravene Supreme Court precedent by granting the government's motion for summary disposition? |
| 21-6197 |
Lance Arnold Kingbird v. Vicki Janssen, Warden |
Eighth Circuit |
2021-11-05 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
28-usc-2253 certificate-of-appealability circuit-split federal-court-procedure federal-courts habeas-corpus judicial-review reasonable-jurists similar-facts statutory-interpretation |
Whether a federal court may find that 'reasonable jurists would not disagree' about the denial of relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2253 where other courts hav… |
| 21-5647 |
Adolphus Symonette v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
2021-09-13 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
2255-proceeding certificate-of-appealability constitutional-rights district-court-discretion habeas-corpus post-offense-rehabilitation reasonable-jurists resentencing sentencing |
Whether reasonable jurists would find the district court's decision to vacate Count 3 of the second superseding indictment while simultaneously denyin… |
| 21-5642 |
Terry Dibble v. Deanna Brookhart, Warden |
Seventh Circuit |
2021-09-10 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appellate-review burglary certificate-of-appealability district-court-conclusion due-process habeas-corpus judicial-discretion jury-instructions legal-standard reasonable-jurists residential-burglary |
Did Mr. Dibble present a ground for relief as to which reasonable jurists could differ concerning the correctness of the district court's conclusion, … |
| 21-5533 |
Marsha A. Springer v. Jeremy Howard, Warden |
Sixth Circuit |
2021-08-30 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
certificate-of-appealability civil-rights constitutional-claim due-process habeas-corpus judicial-review reasonable-jurists sixth-circuit |
Is the Sixth Circuit's denial of certificate of appealability contrary to this Court's precedent? |
| 21-5267 |
Robert Drawn, IV v. Robert Neuschmid, Warden |
Ninth Circuit |
2021-07-30 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-rights constitutional-claims district-court-assessment due-process equal-protection judicial-review legal-standard qualified-immunity reasonable-jurists summary-judgment writ-of-certiorari |
Did petitioner demonstrate that reasonable jurists would find the district court's assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong? |
| 21-5019 |
Noe Perez v. Renee Baker, Warden, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2021-07-07 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appellate-review certificate-of-appealability constitutional-question fifth-circuit judicial-disagreement nevada-supreme-court ninth-circuit reasonable-jurists seventh-circuit |
Did the Ninth Circuit clearly err when it denied Mr. Perez's request for a COA even though three reasonable jurists on Nevada's highest court already … |
| 21-5015 |
Reginald Franklin v. Robert LeGrand, Warden, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2021-07-06 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
certificate-of-appealability due-process habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel ninth-circuit post-conviction post-conviction-relief reasonable-jurists trial-counsel |
Whether the Ninth Circuit clearly erred in denying Franklin's request for a certificate of appealability |
| 20-7807 |
Woodrow Andrew Clark v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
2021-04-20 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-procedure claims-assessment constitutional-law district-court due-process judicial-review legal-standard patent procedural-merit reasonable-jurists standing takings |
Whether reasonable jurists would find the District Court's assessment of Claims one and two debatable or wrong? Or that the issues presented are adequ… |
| 20-7544 |
Demian Dominguez, aka Demain Dominguez v. Brian E. Williams, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2021-03-25 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
cause-of-death certificate-of-appealability effective-counsel ninth-circuit prejudice procedural-default reasonable-jurists |
Whether the Ninth Circuit's order denying a certificate of appealability was clearly erroneous |
| 20-7295 |
Isidro Sauceda v. David Shinn, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections, Rehabilitation and Reentry, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2021-03-02 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
appealability-standard certificate-of-appealability constitutional-rights exculpatory-evidence factual-innocence ineffective-counsel lesser-included-offense ninth-circuit reasonable-jurists willits-instruction |
Whether the Ninth Circuit utilized an unduly burdensome certificate-of-appealability standard that contravenes Supreme-Court-precedent |
| 20-6581 |
Kimberly Hanzlik v. Joseph Joseph, Superintendent, Bedford Hills Correctional Facility |
Second Circuit |
2020-12-09 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
actual-innocence certificate-of-appealability constitutional-rights habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel miller-el-standard reasonable-jurists second-circuit unreasonable-application-of-law |
Was the Second Circuit's denial of Petitioner's application for a certificate of appealability unreasonable |
| 20-5964 |
Marlow Shelton McDonald v. Jeff Titus, Warden |
Eighth Circuit |
2020-10-08 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
28-usc-2253 certificate-of-appealability federal-court federal-courts habeas-corpus procedural-grounds reasonable-jurists statutory-interpretation |
Whether a federal court may find that 'reasonable jurists would not disagree' about the denial of relief on procedural grounds where other courts have… |
| 20-5800 |
Robert L. Rose v. Lynn Guyer, Warden, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2020-09-25 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
abuse-of-discretion appellate-review certificate-of-appealability discretionary-ruling federal-rules-civil-procedure federal-rules-of-civil-procedure habeas-corpus judicial-procedure reasonable-jurists rule-70(a) |
Whether a certificate of appealability is required to appeal an order denying a motion for enforcement made pursuant to Rule 70(a) of the Federal Rule… |
| 20-5274 |
James S. Harris v. Sherie Korneman, Warden |
Eighth Circuit |
2020-08-05 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
certificate-of-appealability district-court equitable-tolling habeas-corpus limitations-period reasonable-jurists |
Did Mr. Harris present reasons for why the one-year limitations period should be equitably tolled in his case to which reasonable jurists could differ… |
| 20-5160 |
Keith Henderson v. Eddie Miles, Warden |
Eighth Circuit |
2020-07-27 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
28-usc-2253 certificate-of-appealability federal-court federal-courts habeas-corpus procedural-grounds reasonable-jurists statutory-interpretation |
Whether a federal court may find that 'reasonable jurists would not disagree' about the denial of relief on procedural grounds where other courts have… |
| 19-7788 |
Ulises Corrales Vega v. Connie Horton, Warden |
Sixth Circuit |
2020-02-26 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-claim due-process frivolous-claim habeas-corpus in-forma-pauperis judicial-review legal-standard reasonable-jurists split standing summary-dismissal writ-of-certiorari |
Did the petitioner raise a substantial constitutional claim that was not so patently false or frivolous as to warrant summary dismissal? |
| 19-7505 |
Lamar James Crump v. Tracy Beltz, Warden |
Eighth Circuit |
2020-01-30 |
Denied |
IFP |
28-usc-2253 certificate-of-appealability federal-court habeas-corpus procedural-grounds reasonable-jurists statutory-interpretation |
Whether a federal court may find that 'reasonable jurists would not disagree' about the denial of relief on procedural grounds where other courts have… |
| 19-7327 |
Antonio Macli v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
2020-01-17 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
certificate-of-appealability claim-by-claim claim-determination constitutional-law criminal-procedure due-process evidentiary-hearing federal-court federal-courts habeas-corpus reasonable-jurists |
Does a federal habeas court have to determine the need for an evidentiary hearing on a claim by claim basis? |
| 18-9046 |
Richard Shusterman v. United States |
Fourth Circuit |
2019-05-01 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
28-usc-2255 certificate-of-appealability district-court due-process fourth-circuit habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel reasonable-jurists standard-of-review |
Did the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals err in denying issuance of a Certificate of Appealability of a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 ruling when the District Court… |
| 18-8820 |
Carman L. Deck v. Richard Jennings, Warden |
Eighth Circuit |
2019-04-15 |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
appellate-procedure appellate-review certificate-of-appealability death-penalty district-court due-process habeas-corpus judicial-discretion procedural-standard reasonable-jurists standard-of-review |
Did Mr. Deck present grounds for relief as to which reasonable jurists could differ concerning the correctness of the district court's conclusion, thu… |
| 18-8798 |
Brent Lynch v. Eddie Miles, Warden |
Eighth Circuit |
2019-04-11 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
28-usc-2253 certificate-of-appealability federal-court habeas-corpus procedural-grounds reasonable-jurists statutory-interpretation |
Whether a federal court may find that 'reasonable jurists would not disagree' about the denial of relief on procedural grounds where other courts have… |
| 18-8695 |
Deontray Vershon Tate v. Jeff Titus, Warden |
Eighth Circuit |
2019-04-03 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
28-usc-2253 certificate-of-appealability federal-court habeas-corpus procedural-grounds reasonable-jurists statutory-interpretation |
Whether a federal court may find that 'reasonable jurists would not disagree' about the denial of relief on procedural grounds where other courts have… |
| 18-8112 |
Floyd Andrew Brown, Jr. v. United States |
Sixth Circuit |
2019-02-22 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
appellate-review certificate-of-appealability civil-rights constitutional-issues constitutional-review due-process habeas-corpus judicial-procedure merit-standard reasonable-jurists section-2255 standard-of-review standing |
Should the judgment be vacated and remanded in light of Buck v. Davis? |
| 18-7935 |
Kahri Smith v. Bonita J. Hoffner, Warden |
Sixth Circuit |
2019-02-13 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
certiorari criminal-procedure felony jurisdiction michigan-law reasonable-jurists self-defense sixth-circuit |
Is certiorari appropriate where the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals decided the merits of petitioner's self-defense claim without jurisdiction and is i… |
| 18-7676 |
Louis Hill v. Cynthia Link, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Graterford, et al. |
Third Circuit |
2019-01-30 |
Denied |
IFP |
certificate-of-appealability civil-rights constitutional-law constitutional-rights due-process habeas-corpus legal-error reasonable-jurists standard-of-review standing substantial-showing third-circuit |
Does the Third Circuit Court of Appeals denial of a Certificate of Appealability in the instant matter constitute legal error given it is debatable am… |
| 18-7587 |
Biven Hudson v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
2019-01-25 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
11th-circuit 28-usc-2255 certificate-of-appealability district-court eleventh-circuit magistrate-court mandatory-minimum minimum-mandatory-enhancement reasonable-jurists sentencing-enhancement sentencing-review |
Whether the appellate court erred in denying Mr. Hudson's motion for certificate of appealability |
| 18-6778 |
DeAngelo Horn v. Julie L. Jones, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections |
Eleventh Circuit |
2018-11-21 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
certificate-of-appealability deficient-performance eleventh-circuit habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel prejudice reasonable-jurists standard-of-review statutory-interpretation |
Did the Eleventh Circuit reach beyond the threshold inquiry for a certificate of appealability and deny a COA based on the merits of the appeal? |
| 18-6733 |
Laura Shauger v. United States |
Third Circuit |
2018-11-19 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
28-usc-2255 aba-standards-for-criminal-justice certificate-of-appealability circuit-courts-of-appeals district-court district-court-ruling ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel reasonable-jurists section-2255 sentencing-counsel supreme-court-of-idaho third-circuit |
Whether rulings by the district court denying relief are debatable by jurists of reason if rulings by other courts in similar situations arguably supp… |
| 18-524 |
Eric D. Gathings v. United States |
Eighth Circuit |
2018-10-19 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
appellate-review certificate-of-appealability certificate-of-appealability-coa due-process habeas-corpus judicial-review reasonable-jurists statutory-interpretation suspension-clause |
Was the appellate court's summary denial of a certificate of appealability (COA) reciting that it had 'carefully reviewed the original file of the dis… |
| 18-6255 |
Christopher Earl Oden v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
2018-10-09 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appellate-procedure certificate-of-appealability circuit-court-precedent circuit-precedent due-process habeas-corpus judicial-review reasonable-jurists standard-of-review |
Is it necessary for a petitioner to show that his claim is not foreclosed by binding circuit precedent to obtain a certificate of appealability? |