No. 22-5291
Barton Ray Gaines v. Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
IFP
Tags: civil-procedure constitutional-rights due-process federal-courts habeas-corpus judicial-review reasonable-jurists recusal rule-60b-motion standard-of-review substantial-showing
Key Terms:
ERISA HabeasCorpus
ERISA HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2022-10-07
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether GAINES made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether GAINES made “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). And whether reasonable jurists could debate the correctness of the disposition of the Rule 60(b) motion. See Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Hernandez v. Thaler, 630 F.3d 420, 428 (Sth Cir. 2011). Ni.
Docket Entries
2022-10-11
Petition DENIED.
2022-09-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/7/2022.
2022-06-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 6, 2022)