No. 20-5160
Keith Henderson v. Eddie Miles, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 28-usc-2253 certificate-of-appealability federal-court federal-courts habeas-corpus procedural-grounds reasonable-jurists statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2020-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a federal court may find that 'reasonable jurists would not disagree' about the denial of relief on procedural grounds where other courts have resolved the same issue, on similar facts, in a manner favorable to habeas petitioner's position
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. In deciding whether to issue a certificate of appealability under 28 U.S.C. § 2253, may a federal court find that “reasonable jurists would not disagree” about the denial of relief on procedural grounds where other courts have resolved the same issue, on similar facts, in a manner favorable to habeas petitioner’s position? 2
Docket Entries
2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-08-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-08-03
Waiver of right of respondent Eddie Miles to respond filed.
2020-07-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 26, 2020)
Attorneys
Eddie Miles
Brittany Dawn Lawonn — Hennepin County Attorney's Office, Respondent
Brittany Dawn Lawonn — Hennepin County Attorney's Office, Respondent