No. 22-507
Tyson Martin v. Ricky D. Dixon, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
Response Waived
Experienced Counsel
Tags: 28-usc-2253 certificate-of-appealability due-process federal-procedure habeas-corpus judicial-review miller-el-standard miller-el-v-cockrell reasonabl-jurists-debate reasonable-jurists
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2023-02-17
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the court of appeals improperly denied the Petitioner a certificate of appealability
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether the court of appeals improperly denied the Petitioner a certificate of appealability under 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) on his federal habeas claim (ie., whether the court of appeals improperly applied the “reasonable jurists could debate” certificate of appealability standard articulated by the Court in Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322 (2003)). il B. PARTIES INVOLVED The parties involved are identified in the style of the case. iii C.
Docket Entries
2023-02-21
Petition DENIED.
2023-01-25
Waiver of right of respondent Ricky D. Dixon, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections to respond filed.
2023-01-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/17/2023.
2022-11-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 30, 2022)
2022-10-11
Application (22A301) granted by Justice Thomas extending the time to file until November 23, 2022.
2022-10-03
Application (22A301) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from October 24, 2022 to November 23, 2022, submitted to Justice Thomas.
Attorneys
Ricky D. Dixon, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
Tyson Martin
Michael Robert Ufferman — Michael Ufferman Law Firm, P.A., Petitioner
Michael Robert Ufferman — Michael Ufferman Law Firm, P.A., Petitioner