Whether the appellate court erred in denying Mr. Hudson's motion for certificate of appealability

QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Issue 1: Whether the appellate court erred in denying Mr. Hudson’s motion for certificate of appealability as to the denial by the district court of his motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence, brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §2255, alleging that he should be resentenced without a 15 year minimum mandatory enhancement as reasonable jurists could debate whether or not the magistrate and district courts erred in denying petitioner’s Motion to Vacate discussed above? Prefix 3 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES OCTOBER TERM, 2018 BIVEN HUDSON, PETITIONER, vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, RESPONDENT. PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT The Petitioner, BIVEN HUDSON, respectfully prays that a writ of certiorari issue to review the judgment/order of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit entered on October 19, 2018.