No. 21-5533
Marsha A. Springer v. Jeremy Howard, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: certificate-of-appealability civil-rights constitutional-claim due-process habeas-corpus judicial-review reasonable-jurists sixth-circuit
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities
SocialSecurity Securities
Latest Conference:
2021-10-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Is the Sixth Circuit's denial of certificate of appealability contrary to this Court's precedent?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED | : Is THE SIXTH CIRCUIT'S DENTAL OF CERTIFICATE OF | APPEALABILITY CONTRARY TO THIS COURT'S PRECEDENT? WHERE ONE | JUDGE OF THE MICHIGAN SUPREME COURT DISSENTED AND INDICATED } HE WOULD HAVE GRANTED LEAVE TO APPEAL CONSTITUTIONAL CLAIM. | THEREFORE, HAS PETITIONER DEMONSTRATED REASONABLE JURISTS | COULD DEBATE THE ISSUES PRESENTED WERE ADEQUATE TO DSSERVE | ENCOURAGEMENT TO PROCEED FURTHER? | i | |
Docket Entries
2021-10-18
Petition DENIED.
2021-09-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/15/2021.
2021-09-20
Waiver of right of respondent Jeremy Howard, Warden to respond filed.
2021-08-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 29, 2021)
Attorneys
Jeremy Howard, Warden
Fadwa A. Hammoud — Michigan Department of Attorney General, Respondent
Fadwa A. Hammoud — Michigan Department of Attorney General, Respondent