| 20-493 |
Ysleta del Sur Pueblo, et al. v. Texas |
Fifth Circuit |
Judgment Issued |
CVSGAmici (5)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (5) |
cabazon-band federal-restoration-act gaming gaming-regulation indian-tribes legislative-interpretation native-american-rights regulatory-jurisdiction restoration-act state-jurisdiction tribal-sovereignty ysleta-del-sur-pueblo |
Whether the Restoration Act provides the Pueblo with sovereign authority to regulate non-prohibited gaming activities on its lands (including bingo), … |
35.5 |
| 20-1668 |
City of Tahlequah, Oklahoma, et al. v. Austin P. Bond, as Special Administrator of the Estate of Dominic F. Rollice, Deceased |
Tenth Circuit |
Judgment Issued |
Amici (6)Relisted (4) |
deadly-force fourth-amendment intoxicated-individual officer-safety police-conduct qualified-immunity seizure use-of-force |
1. Whether use of force that is reasonable at the moment it is employed can nonetheless violate the Fourth Amendment if the officers recklessly or del… |
18.0 |
| 20-1631 |
Drew Hirshfeld, Acting Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office v. Implicit, LLC, et al. |
Federal Circuit |
GVR |
Response RequestedRelisted (2) |
administrative-law administrative-patent-judges appointments-clause constitutional-law inferior-officers judicial-appointment officer-status patent-office principal-officers separation-of-powers us-patent-and-trademark-office |
Whether, for purposes of the Appointments Clause, U.S. Const. Art. II, § 2, Cl. 2, administrative patent judges of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Offic… |
16.0 |
| 20-1654 |
Sonos, Inc. v. Implicit, LLC, et al. |
Federal Circuit |
Denied |
Response RequestedRelisted (2) |
administrative-patent-judges appointments-clause article-ii constitutional-law inferior-officers principal-officers separation-of-powers united-states |
Whether administrative patent judges are
"principal" or "inferior" Officers of the United States
within the meaning of the Appointments Clause. |
11.0 |
| 20-1669 |
Robert Gene Will, II v. Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
Relisted (2) |
discovery fair-trial federal-habeas federal-law gonzalez-v-crosby habeas-corpus judicial-procedure merits procedural-default rule-60(b) |
1. In the federal habeas context, Gonzalez v. Crosby, 545 U.S. 524 (2005), held that a post-judgment motion for relief under Federal Rule of Civil Pro… |
11.0 |
| 20-7622 |
Merle Denezpi v. United States |
Tenth Circuit |
Judgment Issued |
Amici (6)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (4)IFP |
constitutional-provisions court-of-indian-offenses criminal-prosecution double-jeopardy federal-agency indian-law jurisdictional-issue procedural-history tribal-court ute-mountain-ute-agency |
Is the Court of Indian Offenses of Ute Mountain Ute Agency a federal agency such that Merle Denezpi's conviction in that court barred his subsequent p… |
11.0 |
| 20-1745 |
Richard Sylvester v. United States |
First Circuit |
Denied |
|
4th-amendment burden-of-proof community-caretaking fourth-amendment investigatory-motive law-enforcement-procedure police-policy probable-cause subjective-intent totality-of-circumstances vehicle-impound vehicle-impoundment |
1. In order for a vehicle impound to be consonant with the Fourth Amendment, must a police officer comply with established impound policies and proced… |
10.5 |
| 21-221 |
Blake Cretacci v. Joe Call, et al. |
Sixth Circuit |
Denied |
|
civil-rights counsel-communication court-of-appeals-split due-process federal-law legal-representation mailbox-rule prisoner-filing prisoner-representation pro-se-filing standing |
In Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266 (1988), this Court held that filings by prisoners receive the benefit of the mailbox rule, which means that a prisone… |
10.5 |
| 21M31 |
Dakota Access, LLC v. Standing Rock Sioux Tribe, et al. |
District of Columbia |
Presumed Complete |
|
None |
|
10.5 |
| 21-231 |
Julie Ellen Wartluft, fka Julie Ellen Bartels, et al. v. The Milton Hershey School, et al. |
Third Circuit |
Denied |
Amici (3) |
civil-rights civil-rights-act consideration consideration-definition disability disability-discrimination fair-housing fair-housing-act housing-discrimination rental-definition renter student-housing |
To rent is defined in the Act as to lease or to let or otherwise to grant for consideration the right to occupy premises. 42 U.S.C. §3602(e). The Milt… |
8.5 |
| 21-313 |
Ciara Vesey v. Envoy Air, Incorporated, dba American Eagle Airlines, Inc. |
Seventh Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
cats-paw civil-rights due-process employment retaliation summary-judgment |
1. Where the employer in close coordination with petitioner's biased supervisor to conduct a sham investigation which adopted the supervisor's false c… |
8.5 |
| 20-1539 |
Daniel Rivas-Villegas v. Ramon Cortesluna |
Ninth Circuit |
Judgment Issued |
Amici (1)Relisted (3) |
civil-rights constitutional-violation excessive-force fourth-amendment graham-v-connor law-enforcement ninth-circuit plumhoff-v-rickard qualified-immunity supreme-court-precedent |
1. Did the Ninth Circuit depart from this Court's
decisions in Graham v. Connor, 490 U.S. 386
(1989) and Plumhoff v. Rickard, 572 U.S. 765
(2014) in d… |
7.5 |
| 20-1492 |
Abdulmalik Mahyoub Mulhi Abdulla v. Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General |
Third Circuit |
GVR |
Relisted (2) |
None |
|
6.0 |
| 21-206 |
Mourice Neal v. City of Detroit, Michigan |
Michigan |
Denied |
|
civil-rights constitutional-compliance constitutional-interpretation constitutional-law due-process judicial-oath judicial-power legal-jurisdiction standing state-law-conflict statutory-interpretation |
1. United States constitution is the supreme law governing this land correct?
2. All judges in every state is bound by oath or affirmation federal an… |
5.5 |
| 21-208 |
Merrilee Stewart v. IHT Insurance Agency Group, LLC Welfare Benefits Plan, et al. |
Sixth Circuit |
Denied |
|
affordable-care-act americans-with-disabilities-act arbitration civil-rights constitutional-protections disability-rights due-process employment-law erisa privacy |
Before an employee may have been deemed to have waived the comprehensive rights, remedies and procedural protections prescribed in civil rights statut… |
5.5 |
| 21-229 |
Lawrence T. Newman v. Robert W. York |
Indiana |
Denied |
|
appellate-procedure attorney-fees civil-procedure constitutional-law constitutional-rights due-process judicial-discretion legal-review takings |
This case presents a singular question of the outer limits of a citizen's Constitutional due process and other related Constitutional rights in legal … |
5.5 |
| 21-236 |
Charles A. Dread v. Maryland State Police |
Fourth Circuit |
Denied |
|
civil-procedure constitutional-rights due-process evidentiary-hearing hearing maryland-rule-2-311(f) official-responsibility racial-discrimination summary-judgment |
(1) Was the Trial Court's denial of the Petitioner's Motion for Summary Judgment and Request for Hearing without granting the Petitioner a Hearing he … |
5.5 |
| 20-1690 |
Ramon Cortesluna v. Daniel Rivas-Villegas, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (3) |
civil-rights due-process excessive-force graham-factors material-facts police-shooting qualified-immunity scott-v-harris summary-judgment tolan-v-cotton video-evidence |
Did the Ninth Circuit depart from longstanding procedure and precedent and fail to view video and other evidence in the light most favorable to the pl… |
4.5 |
| 21-204 |
Montgomery Blair Sibley v. Frank Paul Geraci, Jr., et al. |
Second Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
bivens-claim constitutional-authority due-process first-amendment frivolous judicial-immunity removal separation-of-powers sua-sponte-dismissal |
Whether a District Court Judge runs afoul of due process by a sua sponte dismissal of Petitioner's Complaint without "hearing" argument and then deemi… |
3.5 |
| 21-215 |
Barry J. Smith, Sr. v. United States Congress, et al. |
Seventh Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
13th-amendment 2nd-amendment civil-rights constitutional-jurisdiction due-process government-consent petition-for-redress second-amendment self-defense thirteenth-amendment |
Does petitioner need the government's consent to petition the government for redress of his grievance that the government has held him in Thirteenth A… |
3.5 |
| 21-247 |
Coalition for Better Government, et al. v. Alliance for Good Government |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
attorney-fees chilling-effect commercial-speech fee-shifting first-amendment lanham-act non-commercial-speech political-speech |
1. Should this Court permit the Lanham Act to be extended to non-commercial political speech?
2. Should this Court permit the imposition of a sanctio… |
3.5 |
| 21-263 |
Kimbro Stephens Insurance Trust, et al. v. James E. Smith, Jr., et al. |
Arkansas |
Denied |
Response Waived |
attorney-termination bankruptcy bankruptcy-procedure civil-procedure client-rights due-process first-amendment fourteenth-amendment lawyer-discharge legal-malpractice standing |
1. Whether a client has a right to discharge a lawyer at any time, whether in Arkansas state court or in Federal Court, with or without cause, subject… |
3.5 |
| 21-302 |
Arthur G. Jaros Jr. v. Village of Downers Grove, Illinois, et al. |
Illinois |
Denied |
Response Waived |
due-process first-amendment free-speech home-rule-powers liberty-interest library-trustee municipal-corporation public-office retaliation |
I. Notwithstanding its Home Rule Powers, did the Respondent Village
of Downers Grove Violate Petitioner Jaros' First Amendment Right
to Freedom of Spe… |
3.5 |
| 21-329 |
Rosemary Garity v. Louis DeJoy, Postmaster General |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
circuit-court civil-procedure civil-rights discrimination due-process fourteenth-amendment jury-trial make-whole-remedy pro-se sanctions standing summary-judgment |
The questions presented show conflict with Precedent of this Court and all Circuit Courts. The significant practical consequence is promotion of discr… |
3.5 |
| 21-353 |
Ethan Hoggatt, et al. v. Allstate Insurance, et al. |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
abuse-of-discretion fair-credit-reporting-act first-amendment insurance-fraud mississippi-unfair-and-deceptive-trade-practices-a negligence-per-se petition-clause right-to-petition |
Petitioners, the Hoggats, filed criminal fraud charges with the Mississippi Attorney General against Allstate a month prior to filing of this civil ac… |
3.5 |
| 21-359 |
Flomo Tealeh v. Ward County, North Dakota, et al. |
Eighth Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
burden-shifting employment-discrimination mcdonnell-douglas prima-facie prima-facie-case protected-activity title-vii workplace-harassment |
1. Whether, in accordance with this Court's directive that the standard for the second prong of a prima facie case of discrimination under the McDonne… |
3.5 |
| 21-389 |
Sergio Momox-Caselis, et al. v. Tara Donohue, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
anderson-v-liberty-lobby appellate-review civil-procedure judicial-procedure liberty-lobby ninth-circuit standard-of-review standards summary-judgment supervisory-power |
Whether the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals departed from the accepted and usual course of the standards established by this Court in Anderson v. Liber… |
3.5 |
| 21-399 |
Chester Lee Reneau v. Mary Cardinas, et al. |
Tenth Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
cruel-and-unusual-punishment deliberate-indifference eighth-amendment medical-negligence prisoner-rights serious-medical-needs seventh-amendment summary-judgment |
Can prison doctors violate the Eighth Amendment by exposing prisoner's to the "unnecessary and wanton" infliction of pain? And, does the Constitution … |
3.5 |
| 21-403 |
Bruce H. Zitka, et ux. v. Michigan |
Michigan |
Denied |
Response Waived |
civil-rights court-order criminal-procedure due-process entrapment-by-estoppel government-liability governmental-officials jury-trial legal-defense res-judicata |
Were the Zitkas denied the right to present evidence to show the jury a prior court order authorized their conduct and to show they acted as they did … |
3.5 |
| 21-412 |
Samantha V. Roussell v. Bank of New York Mellon |
Florida |
Denied |
Response Waived |
14th-amendment 5th-amendment constitutional-amendment due-process evidence-tampering foreclosure foreclosure-fraud impartiality judicial-review mortgage-settlement national-mortgage-settlement |
Whether the Florida Supreme Court and the Fourth District Court of Appeal of Florida ("the Fourth DCA ") violated the due process protections of the 5… |
3.5 |
| 21-446 |
Justin Pannell v. Roger Abshire, et al. |
Texas |
Denied |
Response Waived |
civil-procedure due-process jurisdictional-waiver non-resident-company personal-jurisdiction special-appearance texas-civil-procedure texas-rules-of-civil-procedure waiver |
1. When does a court in a resident's state have jurisdiction over a non-resident company who harms a resident in that resident's state? How does the r… |
3.5 |
| 20-7778 |
Gerald Scott v. United States |
Second Circuit |
Denied |
Amici (1)IFP |
circuit-split criminal-law criminal-statute federal-sentencing physical-force physical-inaction rule-of-lenity statutory-interpretation use-of-force |
Does a crime of physical inaction, in which the inaction is deemed the cause of injury or death, have as an element the "use of physical force against… |
1.5 |
| 20-8335 |
George A. Christian, Jr. v. Oklahoma |
Oklahoma |
Denied |
Response RequestedRelisted (2)IFP |
constitutional-law criminal-procedure due-process fourth-amendment search-and-seizure standing |
Question not identified. |
1.0 |
| 20-8316 |
Michael Lawrence Williams v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
appellate-review criminal-sentencing district-court first-step-act sentencing-reform substantive-reasonableness |
Whether a district court's denial of a motion for relief from under Section 404 of the First Step Act is subject to substantive reasonableness review? |
0.5 |
| 21-5081 |
James Davis v. United States |
Third Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
campaign-contributions evans-v-united-states explicit-quid-pro-quo extortion hobbs-act hobbs-act-extortion honest-services-fraud official-right overrule quid-pro-quo under-color-of-official-right |
1. In McCormick v. United States, 500 U.S. 257 (1991), this Court held that a conviction for extorting a campaign contribution "under color of officia… |
0.5 |
| 21-5439 |
Michael Geoffrey Peters v. Bobby Lumpkin. Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
brady-evidence constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process fair-trial ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel judicial-misconduct jurisdiction jury-selection trial-procedure |
1. Whether or not I am guilty on Count No.l of the indictment?
2. Whether or not I am guilty of Count No.3 of the indictment?
3. Whether of not the … |
0.5 |
| 20-8143 |
Merwin Smith v. United States |
Eighth Circuit |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
circuit-split criminal-law criminal-prosecution evidence evidence-rule-404b federal-prosecution federal-rules-of-evidence gun-possession prior-convictions propensity-evidence rule-404(b) |
Are prior gun possession convictions admissible under Rule 404(b) to prove knowing or intentional gun possession on a later date when the government c… |
-1.0 |
| 21-5095 |
Melissa Elizabeth Lucio v. Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
Amici (2)IFP |
arbitrary-exclusion civil-rights criminal-procedure due-process evidence-exclusion evidentiary-standards expert-testimony false-confession right-to-defense right-to-present-defense |
1. Whether, as the First, Second, Third, Fourth, Sixth, Seventh, Eighth, Tenth, and Eleventh Circuits have held, this Court's cases clearly establish … |
-2.5 |
| 20-8306 |
Donnie Joe Phillips v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
circuit-split criminal-defense criminal-law criminal-procedure due-process entrapment government-inducement law-enforcement unwitting-agent |
Whether the "government inducement" element of the entrapment defense can be met through the actions of an unwitting government agent. |
-4.5 |
| 21-5347 |
Damantae Graham v. Ohio |
Ohio |
Denied |
IFP |
capital-punishment fourteenth-amendment ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel jury-selection racial-bias racial-prejudice sixth-amendment voir-dire |
This Court recently cautioned trial courts to be especially vigilant against "particularly noxious strain[s] of racial prejudice," Buck v. Davis, 137 … |
-4.5 |
| 21-5355 |
Jung Won Yun v. Chung Cha Kim, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-rights covid-19 due-process fee-waiver language-barriers legal-documents litigation pro-se standing supreme-court translation |
Question not identified. |
-4.5 |
| 21-5356 |
Joel Dale Wright v. Florida |
Florida |
Denied |
IFP |
death-penalty due-process eighth-amendment fourteenth-amendment procedural-law retroactivity statutory-construction substantive-law |
1. Whether the Florida Supreme Court's statutory construction in Hurst v. State constitutes substantive law, and if so, whether the Due Process Clause… |
-4.5 |
| 21-5377 |
Alexander Ascencio v. Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
due-process effective-assistance-of-counsel fourteenth-amendment habeas-corpus jackson-v-virginia sixth-amendment sufficiency-of-evidence watson-v-state |
WHETHER THE LOWER COURT DENIED PETITIONER DUE PROCESS, WHEN THE COURT DID NOT CONSIDERED THE SUFFICIENCY OF THE EVIDENCE ON THIS CASE WHICH WAS A CRUC… |
-4.5 |
| 21-5381 |
Lou Tyler v. PHH Mortgage Corporation, dba PHH Mortgage Services, et al. |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-rights due-process foreclosure homeowner-rights loan-modification mortgage mortgage-foreclosure predatory-lending standing statute-of-limitations |
Hasn't the Texas Statue of Limitations in Texas which is 4 (four) years and the time-barred debt expired? The rules and regulations and mortgage law s… |
-4.5 |
| 21-5389 |
Juan J. Martinez v. Texas |
Texas |
Denied |
IFP |
admissible-evidence collateral-proceedings constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process exclusionary-rule fourth-amendment ineffective-assistance probable-cause right-to-counsel search-and-seizure trial-counsel |
Question not identified. |
-4.5 |
| 21-5401 |
Shawn R. Wilson v. Douglas Fender, Warden |
Sixth Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-rights due-process equal-protection judicial-review precedent statutory-interpretation |
Question not identified. |
-4.5 |
| 21-5407 |
Robin Rick Manning v. Michigan |
Michigan |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-rights cruel-and-unusual-punishment cruel-unusual-punishment due-process first-amendment habeas-corpus juvenile-justice miller-v-alabama proportionality-review roper-v-simmons sentencing sentencing-discretion |
1. THE 4 TO 3 MAJORITY DECISION OF HE MICHIGAN SUPREME COURT FLOUTED U.S. SUPREME COURT PRECEDENT i .e. THE EVOLVING STANDARDS OF DECENCY ON PROPORTIO… |
-4.5 |
| 21-5412 |
Alfred E. Caraffa v. California Housing Securities, Inc., et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
access-to-courts civil-rights due-process medical-care prison-conditions retaliation |
the DEfendentos) urder the wroNg
of Listing
CoMpaNy2)
Address the U.S.C.A. violation of
Due Process of Law under Section I925@4)
3 Address tE violatio… |
-4.5 |
| 21-5415 |
Jarvis Brown v. Orleans Parish Sheriff's Office, et al. |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
appellate-jurisdiction civil-procedure civil-rights court-of-appeals due-process equal-protection federal-jurisdiction habeas-corpus judicial-review standing supreme-court-review |
Whether the United States District Court and United States Court of Appeals 5ir have violated United States Federal Constitutional Rights?
Whether th… |
-4.5 |
| 21-5417 |
Alfred E. Caraffa v. Tempe Police Department, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-rights due-process official-capacity pleading-standards qualified-immunity standing |
I Address the Arizona District court's Refusal to trial iN CCSC No.2:I9-CV-O5492-PHx-MTL-ESW) when IrAppendix B pg-2of8 pt. It states Plainti f has cl… |
-4.5 |
| 21-5424 |
Victor H. Canales v. Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
actual-innocence civil-procedure criminal-procedure dna-testing due-process evidence fourteenth-amendment judicial-proceedings legal-counsel post-conviction-relief standing |
Whether prosecutors, courts, and state officials violated the Fourteenth Amendment and state law by conducting proceedings following arrests and charg… |
-4.5 |
| 21-5438 |
Noe Gerardo Morin v. Bobby Lumpkin. Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
brady-disclosure confrontation-clause crawford-standard crawford-v-washington fundamental-fairness hearsay hearsay-statement ineffective-counsel non-testimonial prejudice right-to-confront testimonial |
Mr.Morin alleges that the district court erred by mischaracterizing
• statements from a non-testifying witness, resulting in severe prejudice
agains… |
-4.5 |
| 21-5732 |
In Re Artoska Gillispie |
|
Denied |
IFP |
4th-amendment cell-site-location-information fourth-amendment habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance misidentification personal-location-information probable-cause suggestive-identification warrant |
Has prejudice been shown where defense counsel (a) failed to file a motion to suppress (CSLI) (cell-site location information), and (b) failed to obje… |
-4.5 |
| 21-5787 |
In Re Randall Thomas McArty |
|
Dismissed |
IFP |
civil-rights compassionate-release criminal-procedure due-process extraordinary-circumstances federal-procedure federal-sentencing habeas-corpus parole sentencing sentencing-reduction statutory-interpretation |
1. Whethe the prima fai requiement in 28uss 2244() wud funtion
enn renen ennt f a sentn ot ld l dee etio
of nelease or paude.
2). Whether 28 usc 246 … |
-4.5 |
| 21-5809 |
In Re Dwayne Stoutamire |
|
Dismissed |
IFP |
actual-innocence certificate-of-appealability due-process free-standing habeas-corpus pro-se-status procedural-bar procedural-default standing |
Does the constitution recognize free-standing claims of Actual inNoceNcy?
the facts presented meet the standard Articulated in Schlop v.Dlo, 513 U.5.… |
-4.5 |
| 21-5331 |
Zachary R. E. Rusk v. Fidelity Brokerage Services |
Tenth Circuit |
Dismissed |
Response WaivedIFP |
circuit-court-review civil-procedure due-process judicial-interference judicial-procedure jurisdictional-challenge rule-11 rule-11-motion rule-60-motion standing timeliness |
1. Did the 1 Oth circuit apply the law incorrectly?
2. Did the 1 Oth Circuit fail to consider evidence and pleadings that show that Petitioner did pr… |
-6.5 |
| 21-5353 |
Michael Napper v. Artis Singleton, Warden |
Georgia |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-rights due-process equal-protection jurisdiction standing statutory-interpretation |
Question not identified. |
-6.5 |
| 21-5390 |
Jeanette S. R. Lipinski v. Yolanda Castaneda, et al. |
Seventh Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-rights conflict-of-interest court-administration due-process federal-procedure judicial-bias judicial-conduct judicial-disability judicial-ethics judicial-misconduct recusal |
Question not identified. |
-6.5 |
| 21-5427 |
Kushawn Miles-El v. Connie Horton, Warden |
Michigan |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
6th-amendment capital-case civil-rights competency competency-hearing due-process fourteenth-amendment right-to-be-present right-to-counsel sixth-amendment |
I. WHETHER THE STATE COURT HAS DENIED PETITIONER KUSHAWN MILES-EL ANY RIGHT, PRIVILEGE OR IMMUNITY GUARANTEED HIM BY THE CONSTITUTION AND LAWS OF THE … |
-6.5 |
| 21-5449 |
Lillian J. Cuadrado-Concepcion v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
discretionary-function due-care FTCA Gaubert state-law-obligations subject-matter-jurisdiction |
1. Whether the discretionary function inquiry under Gaubert applies to voluntarily adopted State-law obligations with State-law defined "due care" per… |
-6.5 |
| 21-5498 |
Raymond Concepcion v. Massachusetts |
Massachusetts |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
criminal-procedure eighth-amendment intellectual-disability juvenile-court juvenile-justice mandatory-sentencing miller-v-alabama proportionality youth youth-culpability |
1. Whether the mandatory exclusion of murder defendants between the ages of 14 and 18 from Juvenile Court precludes individualized consideration of th… |
-6.5 |
| 21-5521 |
Antonia W. Shields v. United States |
Second Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process first-amendment free-speech government-accountability government-immunity petition-clause redress-of-grievances sovereign-immunity standing |
Under U. S. Constitution Article III, section 2
and U. S. Constitution Article VI.,
is the Government sovereignly immune to duty
in U. S. Constitution… |
-6.5 |
| 21-5533 |
Marsha A. Springer v. Jeremy Howard, Warden |
Sixth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
certificate-of-appealability civil-rights constitutional-claim due-process habeas-corpus judicial-review reasonable-jurists sixth-circuit |
IS THE SIXTH CIRCUIT'S DENIAL OF CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY CONTRARY TO THIS COURT'S PRECEDENT? WHERE ONE JUDGE OF THE MICHIGAN SUPREME COURT DISSEN… |
-6.5 |
| 21-5608 |
David Angel Sifuentes v. John Prelesnik, Warden |
Sixth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appellate-jurisdiction certificate-of-appealability civil-procedure due-process federal-rules-of-civil-procedure standing |
Rule 6oc6) motion untimely
7o
a
of
tardy
when a litigunt opeto to
their (uoe under Rule 6ocb)C8)
reaper
an interveriny
change of habeno
vo
law within
… |
-6.5 |
| 21-5630 |
Daniel Everett v. State Bar of California |
California |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
administrative-law constitutional-rights disability disability-inactive-status due-process involuntary-inactive-status medical-records postdeprivation-hearing predeprivation-hearing state-bar state-bar-rules |
1. Is constitutional due process of law violated by State Bar rules
that allow the agency to enroll licensees with disabilities on
involuntary inactiv… |
-6.5 |
| 21-5655 |
Timothy Dean Leners v. Wyoming |
Wyoming |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
constitutional-rights criminal-procedure discovery due-process effective-counsel ineffective-assistance pro-se-representation prosecutorial-misconduct right-to-appeal sixth-amendment |
ONE: Was Defendant's 6th Amend. right to Effective Counsel violated when 1st chair appointed counsel testified at W.R.A.P. 21 hearing for new trial th… |
-6.5 |
| 21-5687 |
Darrell Hochhalter v. Jason Clendenion, Warden |
Sixth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
14th-amendment confrontation-clause due-process false-evidence impeachment plain-error recent-fabrication witness-impeachment |
1.) As some jurisdictions have rules regarding recent fabrication and others do not; does "recent fabrication " rise to the same significance as "fals… |
-6.5 |
| 21-5690 |
Pedro Zavala-Armendariz v. United States |
Seventh Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
18-usc-3553(f) appellate-review criminal-procedure criminal-sentencing district-court judicial-discretion safety-valve sentencing statutory-interpretation |
Did the District Court err by not adequately explaining its ruling in applying or not applying the safety valve in connection with 18 U.S.C. §3553(f)? |
-6.5 |
| 21-5704 |
Antoine Martwain Hill-El v. Calvin Johnson, Warden |
Fourth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
14th-amendment 8th-amendment civil-rights due-process excessive-fines incorporation |
Question not identified. |
-6.5 |
| 21-5712 |
George Ferrer Sanchez v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appeal-waiver criminal-procedure due-process judicial-review plea-agreement plea-bargaining prosecutorial-discretion right-to-appeal sentencing |
Across all federal circuits, the courts of appeals have held that, as part of a plea agreement with the government, a criminal defendant can waive his… |
-6.5 |
| 21-5716 |
Pecola Cousar v. New York-Presbyterian Queens |
Second Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights discovery district-court-discretion due-process pro-se-litigant procedural-error standing summary-judgment title-vii |
Whether the district court error and/or abused its discretion by not affording the
Petitioner leave to amend her complaint and instead granted the Re… |
-6.5 |
| 21-5720 |
Mark Eldon Wilson v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
arrest-warrant criminal-complaint evidence federal-rule-of-criminal-procedure-29 judgment-of-acquittal rule-29 sixth-amendment speedy-trial speedy-trial-rights united-states-v-marion |
1. Whether a criminal complaint, at least when paired with an arrest warrant, triggers a defendant's Sixth Amendment speedy trial rights, which attach… |
-6.5 |
| 21-5723 |
Juan Manuel Pardo-Oseguera v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
criminal-procedure plain-error presentence-report safety-valve sentencing sentencing-reduction statutory-minimum weapons-enhancement |
A defendant in a federal criminal case, under the appropriate circumstances, is eligible for a reduction of 2 offense levels and to be sentenced witho… |
-6.5 |
| 21-5725 |
Sergio Amaya-Martinez v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
28-u.s.c.s.-991(b) 5th-circuit circuit-court-interpretation criminal-procedure criminal-sentencing role-adjustment sentencing-fairness sentencing-guidelines statutory-interpretation u.s.s.g.-3b1.2 |
1. Whether the 5th Circuit Court has qualified the minor and minimal role adjustment commentary under U.S.S.G. §3 B1.2 such that the sentences in cons… |
-6.5 |
| 21-5727 |
Frank Cisneros v. United States |
Sixth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
conspiracy criminal-defense criminal-procedure federal-law ineffective-assistance plea-bargaining sentencing-enhancement statute-of-limitations withdrawal |
(1) Whether an attorney's admitted failure to investigate or present
a defendant's affirmative withdrawal from a conspiracy beyond
the applicable st… |
-6.5 |
| 21-5728 |
Alberto Solar-Somohano v. Drew Hirshfeld, Acting Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office |
Federal Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
administrative-appeal administrative-exhaustion appointment-clause carr-v-saul civil-procedure constitutional-challenge patent-registration principle-officer trademark-board |
I.
Whether under Carr v. Saul the exhaustion of
administrative appeal to the Trial Trademark
Board can be bypass directly appealing to the Court
of… |
-6.5 |
| 21-5783 |
Brian D. Smith v. Montana |
Montana |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appeal criminal-procedure critical-stage due-process equal-protection ineffective-assistance-of-counsel plea-bargaining plea-withdrawal post-conviction procedural-default right-to-counsel sentencing |
Is a motion to withdraw guilty plea considered a "critical Stage" requiring the assistance of counsel for a person "too poor" to hire one at the follo… |
-6.5 |