| 24-1298 |
Harold Jean-Baptiste v. Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc. |
District of Columbia |
2025-06-24 |
Denied |
|
booz-allen-hamilton civil-rights discrimination fbi-collusion federal-government judicial-interference |
Can the Federal Government Judicial influence and the Courts interference to disregard all the rules of the Courts to protect a corporation from liabi… |
| 24-1059 |
Harold Jean-Baptiste v. Department of Justice, et al. |
Second Circuit |
2025-04-09 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
bureau-of-investigations civil-rights conspiracy federal-government human-rights judicial-interference |
Can the Federal Government's judicial influence and courts' interference protect the Federal Bureau of Investigations from liability for alleged civil… |
| 24-5241 |
Jason Gatlin v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
2024-08-06 |
Denied |
IFP |
criminal-procedure double-jeopardy due-process eleventh-circuit fifth-amendment judicial-interference jury-verdict |
Whether a jury has rendered a final verdict and jeopardy terminates under the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment where the jury has indicat… |
| 24A54 |
The Moody Bible Institute of Chicago v. Janay E. Garrick |
Seventh Circuit |
2024-07-17 |
Presumed Complete |
|
church-autonomy employment-discrimination first-amendment judicial-interference religious-liberty title-vii |
Whether the First Amendment's church autonomy doctrine protects religious organizations from judicial interference in internal leadership disputes or … |
| 24-5079 |
John W. Patton v. Louisiana |
Louisiana |
2024-07-16 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
actual-innocence confrontation constitutional-rights due-process fair-trial grand-jury impartial-judge judicial-interference perjury pro-se-defendant sixth-amendment stand-by-counsel transcript |
Due-process |
| 22-824 |
The Synod of Bishops of the Russian Orthodox Church Outside of Russia, et al. v. Alexander Belya |
Second Circuit |
2023-03-01 |
Denied |
Amici (8)Relisted (3) |
church-autonomy defamation-claims first-amendment immunity internal-disputes judicial-interference liability ministerial-exception religious-leadership religious-liberty |
Whether the First Amendment's church autonomy doctrine and its 'ministerial exception' should be understood as an immunity from judicial interference … |
| 21-8170 |
Samuel Gaines, Jr. v. Brooks L. Benton, Warden |
Eleventh Circuit |
2022-06-17 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-rights court-fraud criminal-law due-process federal-procedure fraud-on-the-court judicial-interference legal-obstruction obstruction-of-justice prosecutorial-misconduct standing state-procedure |
Whether the lower court's order violated the Petitioner's constitutional and statutory rights by disrespecting the authority of the United States Dist… |
| 21-5331 |
Zachary R. E. Rusk v. Fidelity Brokerage Services |
Tenth Circuit |
2021-08-11 |
Dismissed |
Response WaivedIFP |
circuit-court-review civil-procedure due-process judicial-interference judicial-procedure jurisdictional-challenge rule-11 rule-11-motion rule-60-motion standing timeliness |
Did the 10th circuit apply the law incorrectly? |
| 20-5177 |
Rolando Felix-Carrazco v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
2020-07-24 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
criminal-procedure due-process evidence-sufficiency holdout-juror judicial-inquiry judicial-interference juror-dismissal jury-deliberation jury-deliberations scotus-guidance trial-court-discretion |
Whether repeated questioning of jurors about a holdout juror violates Brasfield v. United States |
| 19-6589 |
Alicia Norman, Kendra Brantley, and Deenvaughn Rowe v. United States |
District of Columbia |
2019-11-13 |
Denied |
IFP |
attorney-client-relationship criminal-procedure criminal-procedure-rule-11 due-process federal-rules judicial-interference plea-agreement plea-bargaining sentencing sentencing-guidelines standard-of-review |
Was the D.C. Circuit's affirmance of Petitioner Brantley's convictions erroneous and in conflict with other federal jurisdictions on the requirements … |
| 18-9021 |
Valerie Arroyo v. Daniel J. Zamora, et al. |
Fourth Circuit |
2019-04-26 |
Denied |
IFP |
bill-of-rights civil-rights color-of-law constitutional-conduct deprivation-of-rights due-process federal-court federal-questions judicial-interference sovereign-immunity state-agencies state-court |
Did the lower tribunal's actions deprive the plaintiff's civil rights and due process? |
| 18-7673 |
In Re Roda Hiramanek |
|
2019-01-30 |
Denied |
IFP |
access-to-courts ada-accommodations civil-rights constitutional-violations due-process equal-protection federal-court-procedure judicial-interference judicial-misconduct standing |
Question not identified |