Due-process

Questions Presented for Review Questions Number One 1. What defense tools are Louisiana pro-se defendants entitled to when they choose to represent themselves pro-se at trial? a. Does it Violate Due Process when they are given no defense tools? b. Is that considered a Fair Trial as guaranteed in the Sixth Amendment? c. What is the remedy when Stand by Counsel fails to assist Pro-Se Defendants in Pre-Trial Investigations? d. Are Pro-Se Defendants entitled to Effective Stand by Counsel? Questions Number Two 2. Is a Freestanding Actual Innocence Claim on its Own Grounds sufficient to overturn a State felony conviction? a. What is the Proof Required to Present that Claim? b. Is the Louisiana One Witness Rule Constitutional even though it requires no Corroboration? As a Number of Other States Require Corroboration? When even the Bible requires conviction on two or three witnesses? stions Number Three 3. Do Louisiana Defendants have a Constitutional Right to have the Complete Court proceedings transcribed from indictment until sentencing? a. Is it a Due Process Violation when the Trial Judge Intentionally removes portions of the transcripts that prove the Petitioner objected on the record? b. Are Louisiana Court Rules that require an “order designating issues” Unconstitutional due to the fact it presents an “incomplete record for the Appellate Court?” c. Does that rule deny a meaningful review of errors? ; d. Are Pro-Se Defendant’s entitled to complete trial transcripts? i e. When they elect to represent themselves? f. Does denial of that violate Due Process? Questions Number Four ; 4, Did Defendant receive a fair review on the “perjury claim” when the Record was incomplete? Did the Defendant prove perjury? a. Was Defendant’s Napue claim substantiated When Defendant repeatedly played recorded interviews of J.M. prior testimony to both 911 operators and police detectives for showing that testimony did not match her current trial testimony when in fact the recordings matched Defendant’s statements to police detectives? b. Did Louisiana District Judge, Steven C. Grefer’s intentional failure to adhere to the Rules of Evidence and the fact Defendant repeatedly “objected” to the Judge’s failure to follow the Rules of Evidence while Defendant was cross examining J.M. and R.D. and C.R. Lead to Defendant’s failure to prove perjury? Questions Number Five 5. Is the Fifth Amendment Provision that requires “Grand Jury” indictments for infamous crimes binding on the State of Louisiana pursuant to the Fourteenth amendment of the United States Constitution thereby abrogating Alexander Vs. Louisiana, 405 U.S. 625, 636, 92 S Ct. 1221 31 L.Ed.2d 536, (1972), and Hurtado Vs. California, 110 U.S. 516, 538, 4 S Ct. 111, 122, 28 L.Ed. 232 (1884)? a. Does the Louisiana District Attorney’s customary use of “bills of informations” to manipulate the random assignment of Louisiana District Judges in intentional efforts to rob Louisiana Defendants Constitutional Right to a fair and impartial Judge violate “due process”? Thereby requiring the Supreme Court to exercise 28 U.S.C.A. § 1251(a) and 28 U.S.C.A. § 1257(a) to correct the injustice? b. Can any Louisiana Pro-Se Defendant or Louisiana criminal Defendant ever . expect to receive a Fair and Impartial Trial as long as this practice remains and District Attorneys are allowed to judge shop? c. Is an impartial gatekeeper fair? Constitutional. d. Is Louisiana required to provide its citizens with more protection then less in regard to the United States Constitution? e. Should this Supreme Court exercise its corrective power to redress this unconstitutional practice when this Court normally rules in favor of States rights? ii Questions Number Six 6. Did Louisiana District Judge, Steven C. Grefer’s repeated interference during cross-examination in itself violate the Defendant’s right to a, Did Defendant’s inability to provide the Appellate Court a “true and correct” portion of the Transcripts when a “true sand c