Whether the lower court's order violated the Petitioner's constitutional and statutory rights by disrespecting the authority of the United States District Court and the Superior Court of Mitchell County

No question identified. : oO Lots 4 wufo/ dis respeet of Vindked States D ittiep Court Chef! Tedge SS Randal Ael’¢ order |For wot us iv : 4q ~ THE R Witty divrepect er Superivy Court oF Aatehel| County hitch Yudge A. Wen neg Cytor fim ilar Trent| hetion Court order. bu poscevting bn CASE We. byf-R109 & Ite 0 ViolabioW oF State and Fedevial'cyminal Imus “For dir ob tying Valid lourt v/derye.” ; : ¥, TH ob stu ction oF Yurtese by ia terfering “ith the Biiinirtrithin 0f Turhve, , Uo t¢ Fraud on the COOH Courly Whew A OASE iy Wot Filég. — Gree A Malo oul pioreevt: on Wheéa tq pevecvtor had (2&0 Of EWdeweer to ute, ra . “ ga ‘ 1 Lb ¢ Surely a bom Spdty wher #0 Co uvt 4 ‘ = FTL 4 conthiod oF Tuteverd whew four Att Waye helpc the prove tutus bo Con Wilh Mone CAlEel ty bons der ; VS. M Liab, Sox F.8d Looe, Leio-n LiUheve Joey) wi Ve Russen, ay ug Ve, ¥29 (1993], SibbacH V.Wiltow 4 Co. 314 vs | yy yea y, an (i927), & see bed 479 USY1) ; Youn g V. US. 40 US, A549 142 ChKhMm ar ¥. NWASC ; 7 hi@ay) De ) 0, Tae. ol VS. 72,44 /99)) Kf ee — —', To , . G18 F-24129 MB or Foi), C0"), Fre YE thin