Alicia Norman, Kendra Brantley, and Deenvaughn Rowe v. United States
DueProcess FifthAmendment Privacy
Was the D.C. Circuit's affirmance of Petitioner Brantley's convictions erroneous and in conflict with other federal jurisdictions on the requirements of Fed. Crim. R. P. 11 and the standard of review
question presented by Rowe is whether the Court should require organizer-leader enhancements to be calculated in such broadly-based prosecutions by evaluating each participant’s significance to the overall scheme? ALICIA NORMAN: V. Whether the use of acquitted conduct at sentencing violated Norman’s Fifth Amendment right to due process and her Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial? ili RULE 14.1(b) CERTIFICATE Petitioners certify as follows: qa) Parties. The parties who appeared before the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in the proceedings which resulted in the judgment from which a writ of certiorari is sought are: Petitioners Alicia Norman, Kendra Brantley, and Deenvaughn Rowe and Respondent the United States of America. Gi)