No. 19-6589

Alicia Norman, Kendra Brantley, and Deenvaughn Rowe v. United States

Lower Court: District of Columbia
Docketed: 2019-11-13
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: attorney-client-relationship criminal-procedure criminal-procedure-rule-11 due-process federal-rules judicial-interference plea-agreement plea-bargaining sentencing sentencing-guidelines standard-of-review
Key Terms:
DueProcess FifthAmendment Privacy
Latest Conference: 2020-03-20
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Was the D.C. Circuit's affirmance of Petitioner Brantley's convictions erroneous and in conflict with other federal jurisdictions on the requirements of Fed. Crim. R. P. 11 and the standard of review

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

question presented by Rowe is whether the Court should require organizer-leader enhancements to be calculated in such broadly-based prosecutions by evaluating each participant’s significance to the overall scheme? ALICIA NORMAN: V. Whether the use of acquitted conduct at sentencing violated Norman’s Fifth Amendment right to due process and her Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial? ili RULE 14.1(b) CERTIFICATE Petitioners certify as follows: qa) Parties. The parties who appeared before the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in the proceedings which resulted in the judgment from which a writ of certiorari is sought are: Petitioners Alicia Norman, Kendra Brantley, and Deenvaughn Rowe and Respondent the United States of America. Gi)

Docket Entries

2020-03-23
Petition DENIED. Justice Kavanaugh took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2020-02-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/20/2020.
2020-02-20
Reply of petitioners Alicia Norman, et al. filed.
2020-02-12
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2020-01-06
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including February 12, 2020.
2020-01-03
Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 13, 2020 to February 12, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-12-05
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 13, 2020.
2019-12-04
Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 13, 2019 to January 13, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-11-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 13, 2019)

Attorneys

Alicia Norman, et al.
Stephen C. LeckarKalbain Hagerty LLP, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent