Mourice Neal v. City of Detroit, Michigan
Environmental Securities
Whether the United States Constitution and state constitutions are the supreme law governing the land, and whether judges and law enforcement officers are bound by oath or affirmation to support the federal and state constitutions
No question identified. : TT ——?ucsTIONS) PRESENTED ;7;«;C 1. United States constitution is the supreme law governing this land correct? 2. All judges in every state is bound by oath or affirmation federal and state level correct? 3. Michigan state constitution of 1963 requires their judges to support Michigan and the U.S. constitution article 11, section 1 correct? 4. Article 4, section 23 is also part of Michigan state constitution of 1963 that the judges of the state of Michigan and police officers must support correct? 5. It is also required that judges in every state follow the court rules correct? 6. Itis also right that if a person can find a case within their jurisdiction to support their side of the argument, it can be used as case law or cited in that manor correct? 7. MCL 752.11 is a state of Michigan law according to Michigan constitution of 1963 article 4, section 23 correct? 8. So if the constitution recognize MCL 752.11 and does not recognize all | have been charged with creates a conflict between constitution and state statues correct? 9. That means all my charges does not meet Michigan constitution of 1963 article 4, section 23 style of laws meaning every one of their state of "Michigan laws must bear proof by way it came into existences correct? 10. And if it is not meeting the requirements of the constitution then that is a crime correct? ; 11. Both constitutions U.S. and the state where the action took or taken place must be followed correct? 12. The court rules federal and state level must be honored and followed correct? 13. If it is found that the judgements | have face is improper state of MI laws. | do have the right to get back what | have loss correct? : 14. And all the judges whom have illegally held me accountable for violation of wittbe charged for viotating their oath or affirmation? —<C=s=‘“C‘<; 2 ;2CSW 15. If the constitution does not allow a judge to give a decision other than to reverse the action and that judge does not it is a personal decision they have made correct? 16. That also means that is usurpation of power? 17. Also meaning that personal decision can cost that judge incarceration correct? S$. TOF PARTIES [ ] All parties appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. : fx] All parties do not appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. A list of ; all