No. 21-403

Bruce H. Zitka, et ux. v. Michigan

Lower Court: Michigan
Docketed: 2021-09-14
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: civil-rights court-order criminal-procedure due-process entrapment-by-estoppel government-liability governmental-officials jury-trial legal-defense res-judicata
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2021-10-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Were the Zitkas denied the right to present evidence to show the jury a prior court order authorized their conduct and to show they acted as they did because governmental officials told them it was legal?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Were the Zitkas denied the right to present evidence to show the jury a prior court order authorized their conduct and to show they acted as they did because governmental officials told them it was legal? ii LIST OF PROCEEDINGS Michigan Supreme Court SC: 162479 People of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Susan K. Hernandez-Zitka, Date of Final Order: June 2, 2021 Court of Appeals State of Michigan No. 349491 People of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Bruce H. Zitka, No. 349494 People of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Susan K. Hernandez-Zitka, Date of Final Opinion: December 10, 2020 Publication Number: 959 NW2d 527 (Mich. 2021) Circuit Court for the County of Ingham Case Nos: 17-102-FH, 17-105-FH People of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Susan K. Hernandez-Zitka, Bruce H. Zitka, Date of Final Order: June 12, 2019

Docket Entries

2021-10-18
Petition DENIED.
2021-09-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/15/2021.
2021-09-20
Waiver of right of respondent State of Michigan to respond filed.
2021-08-31
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 14, 2021)

Attorneys

Bruce H. Zitka, et al.
Ronald Dino AmbroseAttorney-at-Law, Petitioner
State of Michigan
Fadwa A. HammoudMichigan Department of Attorney General, Respondent