No. 21-446
Justin Pannell v. Roger Abshire, et al.
Response Waived
Tags: civil-procedure due-process jurisdictional-waiver non-resident-company personal-jurisdiction special-appearance texas-civil-procedure texas-rules-of-civil-procedure waiver
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2021-10-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)
When does a court in a resident's state have jurisdiction over a non-resident company who harms a resident in that resident's state?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. When does a court in a resident’s state have jurisdiction over a non-resident company who harms a resident in that resident’s state? How does the requirement of “relatedness” intersect with the due process clause and the procedural vehicle of the special appearance? 2. What constitutes waiver of a special appearance under Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 120a? Did the misapplication of Rule 120a of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure deprive Petitioner of due process of law?
Docket Entries
2021-10-18
Petition DENIED.
2021-09-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/15/2021.
2021-09-23
Waiver of right of respondent Roger Abshire, et al. to respond filed.
2021-09-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 22, 2021)
Attorneys
Justin Pannell
Roger Abshire, et al.
Richard Russell Hollenbeck — Wright Close & Barger, LLP, Respondent