No. 21-5389
IFP
Tags: admissible-evidence collateral-proceedings constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process exclusionary-rule fourth-amendment ineffective-assistance probable-cause right-to-counsel search-and-seizure trial-counsel
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity
SocialSecurity
Latest Conference:
2021-10-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the petitioner received ineffective assistance of trial counsel in excluding otherwise admissible evidence?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED | i. Whether ae | tL. of Pet hones received inelCective Assistance of drial Counse/ An Clooac 5 “ e . ‘Ss +o Otherwise Aad missiblc tviclence ? 2. tohehk i < y i ° “e Pek None received ineMective assistmee of trial Counse; avin Re) Advance an a . leas eget > ”n Tgument ax te why his enhancement 3. Wheth . proceedin. een Kas a Tight fo ePRective counsel in collatera) | Nas which provide fre fest OXcaSign, ty R 3 | ine PPeatve Assistance at trie ? 14) haise Q® Clary of |
Docket Entries
2021-10-18
Petition DENIED.
2021-09-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/15/2021.
2021-08-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 17, 2021)
Attorneys
Juan Martinez
Juan J. Martinez — Petitioner