No. 21-5690
Pedro Zavala-Armendariz v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 18-usc-3553(f) appellate-review criminal-procedure criminal-sentencing district-court judicial-discretion safety-valve sentencing statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
Securities Immigration
Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2021-10-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the District Court err by not adequately explaining its ruling in applying or not applying the safety valve in connection with 18 U.S.C. §3553(f)?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Did the District Court err by not adequately explaining its ruling ina pplying or not applying the safety valve in connection with 18 U.S.C, §3553(£)? . i PARTIES The caption of the case contains the names of all of the parties:
Docket Entries
2021-10-18
Petition DENIED.
2021-09-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/15/2021.
2021-09-24
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-09-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 18, 2021)
Attorneys
United States
Brian H. Fletcher — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Brian H. Fletcher — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent