No. 20-8316
Michael Lawrence Williams v. United States
Tags: appellate-review criminal-sentencing district-court first-step-act sentencing-reform substantive-reasonableness
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2021-10-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a district court's denial of a motion for relief from under Section 404 of the First Step Act is subject to substantive reasonableness review?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED I. Whether a district court’s denial of a motion for relief from under Section 404 of the First Step Act is subject to substantive reasonableness review? i
Docket Entries
2021-10-18
Petition DENIED.
2021-09-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/15/2021.
2021-09-15
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2021-08-04
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including September 15, 2021.
2021-08-03
Motion to extend the time to file a response from August 16, 2021 to September 15, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-07-08
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including August 16, 2021.
2021-07-07
Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 15, 2021 to August 16, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-06-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 15, 2021)
Attorneys
Michael Williams
Adam Ryan Nicholson — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
Adam Ryan Nicholson — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States
Brian H. Fletcher — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Brian H. Fletcher — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent