Whether the lower court denied petitioner due process

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . : : WHETHER THE LOWER COURT DENIED PETITIONER DUE PROCESS,WHEN THE COURT DID NOT CONSIDERED THE SUFFICIENCY OF THE EVIDENCE ON THIS CASE WHICH WAS A CRUCIAL ISSUE IN THE PRESENT CASE? The lower courts claims that the sufficiency ; of the evidence are not cognizable on a habe. aS corpus proceeding. This claim goes against . the Watson v State ruling which ruled that / the only standard the reviewing courts should used when considering the sufficiency of the evidence was Jackson v virginia even on a hahbeas corpus oroceeding. II “WHETHER PETITIONER WAS DENIED THE EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL AS GUARANTEED UNDER THE : ARTICLE I! SECTION 10 OF TEXAS CONSTITUTION i AND UNDER THE SIXTH AND FOURTEENTH AMENDMENTS TO THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION, BECAUSE THE LOWER COURTS IMPROPERLY APPLIED THE STARICKLAND V WASHINGTON STANDARD ON THIS CASE AT BAR? ee ‘ . .